Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;26(4):686–692. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw017

Table 3.

Multilevel analysis for very good or good self-perceived health (random intercept for country), N = 30

Model 0
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Model 5 a
β 95% CI β 95% CI β 95% CI β 95% CI β 95% CI β 95% CI
Survey
EU-SILC 1 1 1 1 1 1
SHARE 8.22 4.83 to 11.61 9.10 5.50 to 12.69 3.80 −0.92 to 8.51 7.20 3.61 to 10.80 9.61 5.84 to 13.39 6.96 3.14 to 10.8
ESS 0.16 −3.23 to 3.55 0.84 −2.63 to 4.32 −4.77 −9.80 to 0.25 −0.13 −3.80 to 3.54 0.69 −2.77 to 4.14 −3.12 −7.11 to 0.86
Response 0.08 −0.05 to 0.20 0.13 0.02 to 0.24
Sample size (*1000) −0.65 −1.17 to − 0.14 −0.79 −1.19 to − 0.40
Sampling strategy
Simple random, national records 1
Multi-stage, regional/local records 1.44 −6.27 to 9.15
Single/multi-stage, telephone records 3.00 −4.90 to 10.89
Other −4.19 −11.77 to 3.39
Survey mode
CAPI 1 1
CATI 3.88 −2.56 to 10.33 6.71 1.03 to 12.39
PAPI 4.33 −0.10 to 8.76 5.36 1.63 to 9.10
Self-administered −6.81 −15.32 to 1.70 −3.03 −6.63 to 3.58
Constant 59.49 54.20 65.70 59.05 58.10 55.40
Variance (country) 49.07 50.21 36.97 49.86 42.54 31.86
Variance (residual) 14.99 13.95 13.00 13.66 11.17 6.25
ICC 0.77 0.78 0.74 0.78 0.79 0.84

a Sampling strategy did not statistically significantly contribute to this fully-adjusted model, and was therefore dropped.