Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;126:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2018.01.001

Table 3.

Comparison of cervicovaginal fluid cytokine concentrations (pg/ml) in relation to delivery outcome.

Outcome IL-1α IL-1β IL-2 IL-6 IL-8 IL-10 IL-12 RANTES TNF-α IFN-γ
GTP1 (20–22 weeks)
Term (n = 25) 1167 (375.6–4053) 773.8 (285.6–2351) 24.4 (16.8–29.0) 13.6 (4.9–42.4) 9771 (3437–15864) 6.5 (5.3–9.0) 10.3 (4.7–13.7) 9.2 (6.2–12.9) 6.6 (4.6–8.3) 15.9 (4.2–19.6)
Preterm (n = 22) 812.9 (216.5–1521) 590.8 (132.6–1121) 23.1 (18.3–26.2) 9.9 (5.6–22.3) 6873 (386.4–14548) 6.2 (5.7–8.4) 10.2 (4.9–12.1) 6.7 (4.8–10.6) 6.4 (4.8–7.5) 14.9 (4.3–18.9)
P-value 0.22 0.40 0.54 0.46 0.42 0.93 0.50 0.22 0.47 0.63



GTP2 (26–28 weeks)
Term (n = 33) 661.3 (270.3–1576) 566.4 (59.3–1438) 0.0 (0.0–6.1) 7.3 (0.0–22.4) 6979 (2596–13990) 0.0 (0.0–1.4) 1.6 (0.0–2.1) 3.4 (1.9–7.8) 0.0 (0.0–1.3) 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
Preterm (n = 17) 888.3 (549.8–2579) 659 (310.6–1152) 0.0 (0.0–6.3) 15.6 (2.9–290.5) 10225 (4815–15493) 0.0 (0.0–1.3) 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 4.8 (1.1–8.2) 0.0 (0.0–1.3) 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
P-value 0.24 0.43 0.47 0.09 0.39 0.71 0.08 0.81 0.94 NA



GTP1/GTP2 ratio
Term 1.59 (0.2–2.9) 3.1 (0.3–14.9) 4.0 (2.8–4.8) 2.2 (0.4–5.4) 1.0 (0.1–3.4) 4.0 (2.9–7.3) 4.7 (2.6–6.1) 2.2 (1.7–4.6) 5.8 (3.0–6.2) 4.8 (4.8–4.8)
(n = 18) (n = 17) (n = 17) (n = 9) (n = 11) (n = 17) (n = 9) (n = 12) (n = 13) (n = 7) (n = 1)
Preterm 0.6 (0.01–1.5) 0.6 (0.1–1.9) 4.0 (1.8–9.3) 0.6 (0.03–3.38) 0.3 (0.04–1.4) 5.6 (4.2–4474) 3.6 (2.4–5.7) 1.3 (0.5–1.5) 4.7 (2.5–5.5) 6.5 (6.5–6.5)
(n = 16) (n = 16) (n = 16) (n = 8) (n = 15) (n = 16) (n = 5) (n = 5) (n = 13) (n = 5) (n = 1)
P-value 0.25 0.04* 0.96 0.09 0.14 0.19 0.65 0.004** 0.34 NA

GTP, gestational time point; NA, not applicable. Data presented as median (25th and 75th percentiles). GTP1/GTP2 ratios were computed for only those women who provided paired samples i.e. women sampled at both gestational time points. The total n = 34 (Term = 18 & Preterm = 16) are those women who were sampled at both GTPs. Samples without a particular cytokine or cytokine concentration below the detectable limit of the assay kit (indicated as a value of zero) were subsequently omitted when computing ratios.