Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 24;32(Suppl 4):iv6–iv12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx039

Table 3.

Comparison of barriers and facilitators to integrated care in HICs and LMICs

Integration High-income settings Lower income settings
Examples of enabling strategies
  • Joint governance arrangements

  • Joint funding arrangements

  • Integrated budgets and funding designed to align providers’ objectives, reduce incentives to cost shifting and encourage efficiency

  • Integrated shared patient records

  • Co-production with patients

  • Multi-disciplinary teams of professionals

  • Generic workers (e.g. Buurtzorg model of nurse-led care)

  • Inter-organizational and inter-personal relationship-building is critical to building integrated services

  • Leadership (including political will and explicit implementation strategy) and supportive organizational culture

  • Availability and deployment of appropriately trained and incentivised health workers

  • Good staff morale, motivation and support to overcome structural deficiencies

  • Patient-centred delivery taking into account patients’ complex socio-economic and cultural needs

  • Establishment of a workforce trained to provide a wider range of services at community level (e.g. Health Extension Workers); task shifting

  • Integration of prevention and treatment programmes

  • Integrated care to help ‘normalize’ stigmatized conditions (e.g. HIV, TB)

Examples of key challenges faced
  • Fragmented health care landscape with weak link with prevention

  • Financial barriers between systems thwart efforts to integrate: funding methods are different for health and long-term/social care in many countries (e.g. in England, health is free while social care is means tested)

  • Financial incentives not aligned across types of providers (e.g. acute, primary health care)

  • Competing for resources preventing collaboration (competition rules)

  • Workforce with high degree of professional specialization

  • Lack of IT inter-operability and restrictive information governance rules

  • Lack of ‘hump’ funds to allow providers to transition to different models of care

  • Health care and social care separated by language, conceptions of health, professional cultures and ways of working

  • Primary and community health care sector under-resourced

  • Siloed funding and reporting, with donors wanting accountable results for their specific programmes

  • Lack of incentives for well-funded programmes to integrate with poorer ones

  • Lack of negotiating power for under-funded programmes

  • Limited capacity, support for and number of staff

  • Poor and fragmented Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) infrastructure

  • Fragmented, poorly coordinated care across agencies/sectors

  • Primary health care is generally under-resourced