Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;4(1):E30–E34. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-125311

Table 1 Summary of clinical and sonographic results of n=62 patients with splenic rupture compared between subgroups of spontaneous and traumatic splenic rupture (SR) and with p-values.

All patients Spontaneous SR Traumatic SR p-value
Demographic and clinical data n=62 (100%) n=33 n=29
Age (average) 53.5 years 61.8 years 44 years 0.01
Indication for US investigation: Follow-up after primary CT diagnosis 43.5% 30.3% 58,6% n.s.
Indication for US investigation: incidental 24.2% 36.4% 10,3% 0,02
Interventional therapy (surgery or interventional radiology) 41.3% 45.5% 34,4% n.s.
Follow-up (alive 4 weeks after diagnosis) 80.6% 63..6% 100% <0.001
Imaging data
Splenomegaly 71% 78.7% 62% 0.17
Value of CEUS data
Grade 4 (high-grade rupture) in B-mode US 6.5% 6.1% 6.9% n.s.
Grade 4 (high-grade rupture) in CEUS 29% 33.3% 24.1% n.s.
Value of CEUS for higher grading 69.4% 66.7% 72.4% n.s
Value of CEUS for diagnosis 58.1% 51.5% 65.5% n.s.
Value of CEUS for therapy 14.5% 15.2% 13.8% n.s.