Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 4;16(4):208–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00108.x

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of N= 93 patients with minor depressiona

Demographics:
Age Mean (SD) Mdn [Range] 46.8 (14.7)
46.2 [21–82]
 Gender N (%) Female 43 (46.2)
 Race N (%) White 81 (87.1)
N (%) African American 3 (3.2)
Asian 2 (2.2)
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1 (1.1)
 Ethnicity Did not provide information 6 (6.4)
Hispanic/Latino 4 (4.3)
 Education N (%) At least some college 90 (96.8)
 Marital statusb N (%) Married/Living together 33 (36.3)
Separated/Divorced/Widowed 14 (15.4)
Never married 44 (48.3)
 Employment status N (%) Currently employed 64 (68.8)
 Any comorbid disorder N (%) Current (nonprimary) 10 (10.8)
N (%) Lifetime 29 (31.2)
Clinical rating scales:
 Inventory for depressive Mean (SD) 22.0 (4.7)
  symptomatology—clinician rated Mdn [Range] 22.0 [11–34]
  (30‐Item Version) (IDS‐C30)
 Hamilton depression rating scale (17‐Item Mean (SD) 13.3 (2.1)
  Version) (HAM‐D17)c Mdn [Range] 13.0 [10–18c]
 Global assessment of functioning Mean (SD) 62.6 (5.0)
 (GAF) Scaled Mdn [Range] 65.0 [45–69]e

aBased on completed Screen Visit data for N= 93 patients meeting all entry criteria for the minor depression treatment trial described in detail in the text.

bTwo cases have missing data for this item.

cHAM‐D17 of 10–17 was required for entry into the study. Due to a hand‐scoring error, one case entered the study with a HAM‐D17 score of 18.

dGAF scale values range from 1 (most severely impaired) to 100 (superior functioning). Ratings of 41–50 represent serious impairment, 51–60 represent moderate impairment, and 61–70 represent mild impairment.

eThe distribution of GAF scores is negatively skewed as follows: N= 5 (5.4%) had a value of 45–50; N= 8 (8.6% had a value of 55–59; N= 19 (20.4%) had a value of 60; the remaining N= 61 (65.6%) had GAF values of 62–69.