. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;19(4):345–352. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001471

Table 4.

Relationship between nutrition initiation time group and 12 month GOS-E Peds score

	n = 86 (%)	12 month GOS-E Peds			p value
	n = 86 (%)	1 – 4 (n = 49, 57%)	5 – 7 (n = 25, 29.1%)	8 (n = 12, 13.9%)	p value
Nutrition Group					0.04^*
Group 1	5,(5.8)	1,(20)	1,(20)	3,(60)
Group 2	32,(37.2)	19,(59.4)	11,(34.4)	2,(6.2)
Group 3	33,(38.4)	22,(66.7)	7,(21.2)	4,(12.1)
Group 4	16,(18.6)	7,(43.7)	6,(37.5)	3,(18.8)

Pairwise comparisons: Group 1 vs. 2, p = 0.005*; Group 1 vs. 3, p = 0.03*; Group 1 vs. 4, p = 0.20; Group 2 vs. 3, p = 0.41; Group 2 vs. 4, p = 0.35; Group 3 vs. 4, p = 0.31

GOS-E Peds, Glasgow Outcome Scale extended for Pediatrics; Group 1 – no nutritional support administered during study period; Group 2 – nutritional support initiated < 48 h after injury; Group 3 – nutritional support initiated 48 h – < 72 h after injury; Group 4 – nutritional support initiated 72 h – 168 h after injury