Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Feb 24;43(4):360–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.013

Table 1.

Comparison of nerve barrier options based on ideal characteristics for a barrier to epineural scarring.

Ideal characteristics Adipofascial or
muscle flap
Vein wrapping Hyaluronic acid-
carboxycellulose
membrane
(Seprafilm)
Bovine collagen
NeuraWrap;
NeuraMend)
Porcine small
intestine submucosa
(Axoguard)

Biocompatible Yes. Yes No reports of rejection. No reports of rejection. No reports of rejection.
Non-absorbable Non-absorbable Absorbs by 7 days Absorbs by 4–8 months Absorbs by 3 months.

Semipermeable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Non-constricting No reported cases of cicatrix formation after use. No reported cases of cicatrix formation after use. No reported cases of cicatrix formation after use. No reported cases of cicatrix formation after use. No reported cases of cicatrix formation after use.

Promote nerve gliding Yes Yes – demonstrated in animal model Unknown Unknown Unknown

Minimal/no donor site morbidity Depends on flap harvested (minimal for local fat pad flap) Yes (typically edema) No donor site morbidity No donor site morbidity No donor site morbidity

Minimal cost or supply restraints Increased surgery time Increased surgery time Subject to implant cost and availability Subject to implant cost and availability Subject to implant cost and availability