Table 2.
MSW (N=437) |
MSM (N=1053) |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Univariable linear regression analysis |
Multivariable linear regression analysisa |
Univariable linear regression analysis |
Multivariable linear regression analysisa |
||||||||||
Beta | (95%CI) | P-value | Beta | (95%CI) | P-value | Beta | (95%CI) | P-value | Beta | (95%CI) | P-value | ||
Sociopsychological determinants | |||||||||||||
Risk perception | 0.30 | (0.21–0.40) | <0.001 | 0.20 | (0.16–0.25) | <0.001 | |||||||
Attitude towards HPV vaccination | 0.90 | (0.83–0.97) | <0.001 | 0.57 | (0.49–0.66) | <0.001 | 0.81 | (0.78–0.85) | <0.001 | 0.66 | (0.61–0.71) | <0.001 | |
Negative outcome expectancies of HPV vaccination | 0.24 | (0.15–0.33) | <0.001 | 0.15 | (0.10–0.19) | <0.001 | −0.03 | (−0.06 to 0.00) | 0.031 | ||||
Anticipated regret about rejecting HPV vaccination | 0.55 | (0.44–0.65) | <0.001 | 0.12 | (0.05–0.19) | 0.001 | 0.47 | (0.42–0.52) | <0.001 | 0.09 | (0.05–0.13) | <0.001 | |
Beliefs about HPV vaccination | 0.22 | (0.12–0.32) | <0.001 | 0.11 | (0.05–0.17) | <0.001 | |||||||
Subjective norm towards HPV vaccination | 0.55 | (0.45–0.66) | <0.001 | 0.12 | (0.05–0.19) | 0.002 | 0.38 | (0.32–0.43) | <0.001 | ||||
Descriptive norm towards HPV vaccination | 0.74 | (0.62–0.88) | <0.001 | 0.11 | (0.01–0.21) | 0.024 | 0.49 | (0.43–0.56) | <0.001 | 0.10 | (0.06–0.15) | <0.001 | |
Self-efficacy expectations towards HPV vaccination | 0.61 | (0.54–0.68) | <0.001 | 0.29 | (0.23–0.35) | <0.001 | 0.52 | (0.45–0.58) | <0.001 | 0.19 | (0.15–0.24) | <0.001 | |
Socio-demographic characteristics | |||||||||||||
Age | 0.128 | 0.019 | |||||||||||
≤26 years | REF | REF | REF | REF | |||||||||
27–40 years | 0.26 | (−0.02 to 0.54) | −0.14 | (−0.31 to 0.03) | 0.103 | 0.26 | (0.08–0.43) | 0.09 | (−0.02 to 0.19) | 0.111 | |||
≥41 years | 0.38 | (−0.024 to 1.00) | −0.43 | (−0.79 to −0.07) | 0.021 | 0.17 | (−0.00 to 0.34) | −0.02 | (−0.13 to 0.09) | 0.711 | |||
Educational level | 0.150 | 0.753 | |||||||||||
Lower education | REF | REF | |||||||||||
High education | 0.25 | (−0.09 to 0.59) | −0.03 | (−0.20 to 0.15) | |||||||||
Health related characteristics | |||||||||||||
HIV status | 0.405 | <0.001 | |||||||||||
HIV-negative | REF | REF | |||||||||||
HIV-positive | 0.73 | (−0.41 to 1.87) | 0.37 | (0.20–0.54) | |||||||||
Unknown or not willing to disclose | −0.05 | (−0.35 to 0.24) | −0.21 | (−0.42 to −0.02) | |||||||||
History of anogenital warts | <0.001 | 0.007 | |||||||||||
No | REF | REF | |||||||||||
Yes | 0.75 | (0.41–1.09) | 0.18 | (0.05–0.32) | |||||||||
Sexual behavior | |||||||||||||
Number of sexpartners in preceding 6 monthsb | 0.00 | (−0.17 to 0.18) | 0.993 | 0.08 | (0.01–0.15) | <0.001 | |||||||
Lifetime number of sexpartnersb,c | 0.11 | (0.00–0.23) | 0.059 | 0.07 | (−0.00 to 0.14) | 0.051 | 0.09 | (0.06–0.13) | <0.001 | 0.03 | (0.01–0.05) | 0.018 | |
HPV related variables | |||||||||||||
Knowledge about HPV | 0.17 | (0.10–0.23) | <0.001 | 0.06 | (0.02 to 0.10) | 0.005 | 0.06 | (0.02–0.09) | 0.003 | ||||
Friends with a history anogenital warts | 0.017 | 0.100 | |||||||||||
No | REF | REF | |||||||||||
Yes | 0.37 | (0.07–0.67) | 0.11 | (−0.02 to 0.24) | |||||||||
Friends with (a history of) anal/penile cancer | 0.921 | 0.194 | |||||||||||
No | REF | REF | |||||||||||
Yes | 0.38 | (−0.71 to 0.79) | 0.13 | (−0.07 to 0.33) |
Abbreviations: HP4V=human papillomavirus preparedness for vaccination; CI=confidence interval; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; HPV=human papillomavirus; MSW=men who have sex with only women only; MSM=men who have sex with men.
The multivariable analyses were executed by adding variables in two steps: (step 1) socio-psychological determinants, (step 2) medical history, sexual behavioral characteristics and HPV related variables. R squared (R2) is a measure that indicates how well the data fit a linear regression model. We found in MSW that after step 1 the R2 was 0.70 and after step 2 the R2 was 0.71. We found in MSM the R2 to be 0.68 after step 1 and this did not change after adding the variables significant in step 2.
For analyses purposes lifetime number of sexual partner was log transformed.
in MSW: number of female sex partners; in MSM: number of male sex partners.