Table 3.
Category of evidence and strength of recommendation
| Topic | Recommendation | Category of evidence | Strength of recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effects on post extraction space | Early extraction of compromised FPM leads to decrease in post extraction space | III*** | C^ |
| Effect on development and eruption of SPM | Early extraction of compromised FPM results in accelerated development and eruption of SPM | III*** | C^ |
| Effect on development and eruption of third molar | Early extraction of compromised FPM results in accelerated development and eruption of third molar | III*** | C^ |
| Caries and/or filling of adjacent teeth | Early extraction of compromised FPM causes a decrease in caries and/or fillings of proximal surfaces on adjacent teeth | III*** | C^ |
| Effects on incisors | Early extraction of compromised FPM results in lingual tipping and retrusion of lower incisors | III*** | C^ |
| Effects on skeletal development | Early extraction of compromised FPM results in counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane | III*** | C^ |
Notes: ***According to the system devised by Shekelle et al. [13] to grade evidence, Category III is evidence from nonexperimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, cohort studies, and case-control studies. ^According to the system used for classifying the strength of the recommendations devised by Shekelle et al. [13], Class C is directly based on category III evidence or a recommendation extrapolated from category I or II evidence
Abbreviations: FPM first permanent molar, SPM second permanent molar