Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 5;18:248. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3040-y

Table 2.

Baseline demographics and hospital use characteristics of home-based primary care (HBPC) and home care (HC) recipients

HBPC Recipients
n = 246
HC Recipients
n = 492
p-value*
Mean age in years at admission (SD) 85.2 (9.2) 84.1 (9.1) 0.127
 Minimum – maximum 55.8 – 103.9 56.5 – 103.1
Age above 90 years, n (%) 82 (33.3) 125 (25.4) 0.024
Male, n (%) 87 (35.4) 175 (35.6) 0.957
CHESS Scorea, n (%)
 0 47 (19.1) 94 (19.1) 1.000
 1 79 (32.1) 158 (32.1)
 2 73 (29.7) 160 (32.5)
 3 35 (14.2) 61 (12.4)
 4 11 (4.5) 19 (3.9)
 5 1 (0.4) 0
MAPLe Scorea, n (%)
 1 4 (1.6) 12 (2.4) 1.000
 2 13 (5.3) 40 (8.1)
 3 64 (26.0) 110 (22.4)
 4 107 (43.5) 237 (48.2)
 5 58 (23.6) 93 (18.9)
Lives alone 132 (53.9) 266 (54.1) 0.962
 Missing, n 1
ED visit rate§ per 1000 PD (95% CI) 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) 3.0 (2.8, 3.2) <.0001
CTASa, n (%)
 1-3 451 (72.6) 613 (66.3) 0.008
 4-5 170 (27.4) 312 (33.7)
Hospital admission rate§ per 1000 PD (95% CI) 2.3 (2.1, 2.5) 1.3 (1.2, 1.4) <.0001
Days spent in hospital§ per 1000 PD (95% CI) 41.8 (40.7, 42.8) 18.6 (18.2, 19.1) <.0001

SD standard deviation, CHESS Hospital and Community Outcome Measures (An algorithm derived from the MDS-RAI data and developed to detect frailty and instability in health; identifies individuals at serious risk of decline; scale ranges from 0 (no instability) to 5 (highest level of instability)), MAPLe Method for Assigning Priority Levels (An algorithm derived from the MDS-RAI data and based on 14 indicators such as Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and cognitive functioning, falls, and risk of institutionalization; assigns a level from 1 (low) to 5 (very high) of functional dependency), ED Emergency Department, PD patient days, CI confidence interval, CTAS Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (A classification scale that groups patients into five levels of urgency when they present to the ED, ranges from 1 (resuscitation) to 5 (non urgent))

*Tests of comparison included two independent samples t-test or Chi-square test; significant results are presented in boldface and italics

aTests of comparison for CHESS Score, MAPLe Score, and CTAS carried out using binary variables: CHESS 0-1 versus CHESS 2-5; MAPLe 1-3 versus MAPLe 4-5; CTAS 1-3 versus CTAS 4-5

§p-value generated from univariate Poisson regression models; significant results are presented in boldface and italics