Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 22;10(4):e8483. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708483

Table 1.

Features of variants identified in P1 and P2

Patient Exon Position MAF Prediction
Genomic Chr2(GRCh37) cDNA NM_001631.4 Proteins CADD MSC:3.13 PoliPhen‐2 SIFT Mutation Taster
1 3 g.233321394G>A c.289G>A p.Ala97Thr 0.0004362 27.1 Probably damaging score: 1.0 Deleterious score: 0.03 Disease causing P‐value: 0.997
9 g.233322984C>T c.1049C>T p.Ala350Val No Freq 19.95 Possibly damaging score: 0.532 Tolerated score: 0.35 Disease causing P‐value: 0.644
2 9 g.233323014C>T c.1079C>T p.Ala360Val 0.0006363 27.8 Probably damaging score: 0.990 Tolerated score: 0.36 Disease causing P‐value: 1
11 g.233323584C>T c.1315C>T p.Gln439X 0.0001295 19.3

MAF, minor allelic frequency based on 60,706 individuals genotyped as part of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC: http://exac.broadinstitute.org). Variant predictions are based on PolyPhen‐2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2), SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org), Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org). Mutation significance cut‐off (MSC), a gene‐level‐specific cut‐off for CADD scores, was generated for ALPI (http://pec630.rockefeller.edu:8080/MSC/).