Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;38(11):5666–5680. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23756

Table 1.

Sample demographics

Young adults Older adults
Training group Active control Passive control Training group Active control Passive control
(18F/13M) (11F/2M) (13F/15M) (23F/21M) (11F/7M) (33F/16M)
M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD
Age 26.0 ± 3.3 26.6 ± 3.2 26.1 ± 3.0 73.3 ± 2.7 73.5 ± 2.9 73.4 ± 3.2
Edu 15.6 ± 1.8 15.4 ± 2.1 15.8 ± 2.2 15.7 ± 3.1 16.2 ± 2.7 14.3 ± 2.6
MMSE 29.0 ± 1.2 29.5 ± 0.7 29.3 ± 1.1 28.8 ± 1.3 28.2 ± 1.5 28.8 ± 1.1
IQ 110.9 ± 9.9 112.1 ± 5.2 114.6 ± 8.5 122.4 ± 11.1 121.3 ± 5.6 118.4 ± 10.3
CVLT L 61.4 ± 5.5 62.3 ± 9.4 62.8 ± 8.6 47.2 ± 10.8 50.0 ± 10.0 47.0 ± 10.3
CVLT R 13.9 ± 1.7 14.5 ± 2.1 13.9 ± 2.5 10.1 ± 3.5 11.4 ± 3.3 9.9 ± 2.8
MRI interval (days) 77.2 ± 3.9 77.9 ± 1.8 76.7 ± 0.9 75.8 ± 8.3 77.3 ± 1.1 76.6 ± 3.1

The table includes demographics for the included participants measured at baseline. Analysis of variance (Bonferroni corrected) showed no differences between the intervention groups in the young and the older samples, respectively (all P values above 0.16, with the exception of a tendency toward a difference in education between the passive and the active control group in the older sample (P = 0.051). Across intervention groups, the young adults performed better than the older adults on MMSE (t = 2.69, P = 0.08), CVLT learning (L) (t = 10.99, P = 7.82 × 10−22) and CVLT recall (R) (t = 9.79, P = 1.89 × 10−18). The older adults showed higher IQ scores than the young adults (t = 5.46, P = 1.57 × 10−7).