Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 12;35(3):209–219. doi: 10.1002/da.22714

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

Author Recruitment Primary Diagnosis Intervention (n) Control (n) Depression Measure Costs Measure Follow‐Upb Risk of Bias Country
Buntrock (2015) General populationa Depressive symptoms ≥16 CES‐D and no MDD based on DSM‐IV CBT+CAU (202) CAU+PE (204) CES‐D TiC‐P 26, 52 8/8 GER
Geraedts (2016) Occupational setting Depressive symptoms ≥16 CES‐D CBT+PST (116) CAU (115) CES‐D TiC‐P 8, 26, 52 8/8 NL
Kolovos (2016) Specialized mental health care MDD diagnosis based on DSM‐IV PST+CAU (136) Self‐help book+CAU (133) CES‐D TiC‐P 8, 26, 52 8/8 NL
Nobis (2016) General population Depressive symptoms ≥23 CES‐D and diabetes CBT+CAU (129) CAU+PE (128) CES‐D TiC‐P 26 8/8 GER
Warmerdam (2010) General population Depressive symptoms ≥16 CES‐D PST (88); CBT (88) WL (87) CES‐D TiC‐P 5, 8 7/8 NL

CAU = care as usual; CBT = cognitive behavioral therapy; CES‐D = Center for Epidemiological Studies for Depression Scale; GER = Germany; MDD = major depressive disorder; NL = Netherlands; PE = psychoeducation; PST = problem solving therapy; TiC‐P = Trimbos and iMTA questionnaire on costs associated with psychiatric illness; WL = waiting list.

a

Participants with subclinical depression.

b

In weeks from baseline.