Table 4.
Cohort | Model structure | Model # | Relative chisqa | RMSEAb | CFIc | TLId | NFIe | SRMRf | χ2 difference test |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Postpartum half #1 | 6-factor | Mod1 | 1.454 | 0.062 | 0.870 | 0.839 | 0.692 | 0.078 | |
1-factor | Mod2 | 1.924 | 0.088 | 0.708 | 0.671 | 0.551 | 0.091 | ||
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? | Lower ✓ | Lower ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Lower ✓ | χ2 diff=91.844 p=0.000 **** | ||
Postpartum half #2 | 6-factor | Mod3 | 1.621 | 0.072 | 0.885 | 0.858 | 0.756 | 0.068 | |
1-factor | Mod4 | 1.635 | 0.073 | 0.871 | 0.854 | 0.729 | 0.071 | ||
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? | Lower ✓ | Lower ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Lower ✓ | χ2 diff=24.796 p=0.037 * |
||
After-postpartum | 6-factor | Mod5 | 1.786 | 0.077 | 0.855 | 0.820 | 0.731 | 0.073 | |
1-factor | Mod6 | 2.066 | 0.090 | 0.783 | 0.756 | 0.658 | 0.084 | ||
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? | Lower ✓ | Lower ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Lower ✓ | χ2 diff=67.515 p=0.000 **** |
||
Clinical depression postpartum | 6-factor | Mod7 | 1.237 | 0.052 | 0.853 | 0.818 | 0.566 | 0.079 | |
1-factor | Mod8 | 1.364 | 0.065 | 0.751 | 0.720 | 0.472 | 0.086 | ||
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? | Lower ✓ | Lower ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Higher ✓ | Lower ✓ | χ2 diff=28.081 p=0.014 * |
Relative chi-square is calculated as the chi-square statistic divided by the degrees of freedom. Lower values indicate better fit. Values < 2 are considered acceptable (Ullman, 2001), disqualifying Mod6.
The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is a noncentrality-based index, for which lower values indicate better fit. RMSEA values < 0.05 indicates close fit (Steiger, 1990), and values < 0.08 are considered acceptable (Browne, Cudeck, Bollen, & Long, 1993; Cangur & Ercan, 2015; Hooper, Coughlan, & Mullen, 2008), disqualifying Mod2 and Mod6.
The comparative fit index (CFI) is another noncentrality-based index, for which higher values indicate better fit (Bentler, 1990). Values > 0.80 are considered acceptable (Sharma, Mukherjee, Kumar, & Dillon, 2005), disqualifying Mod2,6,8.
The Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) is a relative fit index, for which higher values indicate better fit (Tucker & Lewis, 1973).
The Normed Fit Index (NFI) is an incremental fit measure for which larger values indicate better fit (Bentler & Bonett, 1980).
The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) (Joreskog & Sorbom, 1981) is an absolute fit index for which lower values indicate better fit. Values ≤ .08 indicate good fit (L.-t. Hu & Bentler, 1998; L. t. Hu & Bentler, 1999), disqualifying Mod2,6,8.
Inspection of the standardized residual correlation tables revealed no patterns of fit problems, as no more than 2 of the 18 correlations for any individual item were significant at the 0.05 level. Modification indices were all small (<25.00) indicating no need to alter the models’ designs.
p<0.05
p<0.01
p<0.001