Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2018 Feb 2;35(4):292–304. doi: 10.1002/da.22719

Table 4.

Confirmatory factor analysis fit indices

Cohort Model structure Model # Relative chisqa RMSEAb CFIc TLId NFIe SRMRf χ2 difference test
Postpartum half #1 6-factor Mod1 1.454 0.062 0.870 0.839 0.692 0.078
1-factor Mod2 1.924 0.088 0.708 0.671 0.551 0.091
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? Lower ✓ Lower ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Lower ✓ χ2 diff=91.844 p=0.000 ****
Postpartum half #2 6-factor Mod3 1.621 0.072 0.885 0.858 0.756 0.068
1-factor Mod4 1.635 0.073 0.871 0.854 0.729 0.071
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? Lower ✓ Lower ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Lower ✓ χ2 diff=24.796
p=0.037 *
After-postpartum 6-factor Mod5 1.786 0.077 0.855 0.820 0.731 0.073
1-factor Mod6 2.066 0.090 0.783 0.756 0.658 0.084
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? Lower ✓ Lower ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Lower ✓ χ2 diff=67.515
p=0.000 ****
Clinical depression postpartum 6-factor Mod7 1.237 0.052 0.853 0.818 0.566 0.079
1-factor Mod8 1.364 0.065 0.751 0.720 0.472 0.086
Is 6-factor better fit than 1-factor model? Lower ✓ Lower ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Higher ✓ Lower ✓ χ2 diff=28.081
p=0.014 *
a

Relative chi-square is calculated as the chi-square statistic divided by the degrees of freedom. Lower values indicate better fit. Values < 2 are considered acceptable (Ullman, 2001), disqualifying Mod6.

b

The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is a noncentrality-based index, for which lower values indicate better fit. RMSEA values < 0.05 indicates close fit (Steiger, 1990), and values < 0.08 are considered acceptable (Browne, Cudeck, Bollen, & Long, 1993; Cangur & Ercan, 2015; Hooper, Coughlan, & Mullen, 2008), disqualifying Mod2 and Mod6.

c

The comparative fit index (CFI) is another noncentrality-based index, for which higher values indicate better fit (Bentler, 1990). Values > 0.80 are considered acceptable (Sharma, Mukherjee, Kumar, & Dillon, 2005), disqualifying Mod2,6,8.

d

The Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) is a relative fit index, for which higher values indicate better fit (Tucker & Lewis, 1973).

e

The Normed Fit Index (NFI) is an incremental fit measure for which larger values indicate better fit (Bentler & Bonett, 1980).

f

The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) (Joreskog & Sorbom, 1981) is an absolute fit index for which lower values indicate better fit. Values ≤ .08 indicate good fit (L.-t. Hu & Bentler, 1998; L. t. Hu & Bentler, 1999), disqualifying Mod2,6,8.

Inspection of the standardized residual correlation tables revealed no patterns of fit problems, as no more than 2 of the 18 correlations for any individual item were significant at the 0.05 level. Modification indices were all small (<25.00) indicating no need to alter the models’ designs.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001