Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2017 Nov 16;34(2):138–147. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12286

Table 1.

Provider Characteristics, by Physician’s Medical Specialty, 2010

Alla GE GS IM FM CRS P valueb
Overall Distribution, n (%) 583
(100)
153
(26.2)
165
(28.3)
76
(13.0)
106
(18.2)
17
(2.9)
Overall Annual Volume,c mean (SD) 152
(240)
426
(268)
83
(102)
38
(197)
14
(38)
275
(192)
< .001
Primary Office Setting, n (%)
  Urban County 399
(68.4)
133
(86.9)
117
(70.9)
50
(65.8)
40
(37.7)
17
(100.0)
< .001
  Rural County 184
(31.6)
20
(13.1)
48
(29.1)
26
(34.2)
66
(62.3)
N/A
Hospital 456
(78.2)
61
(39.9)
149
(90.3)
69
(90.8)
99
(93.4)
15
(88.2)
  Urban County 287
(62.9)
53
(86.9)
104
(39.8)
43
(62.3)
33
(33.3)
15
(100.0)
< .001
  Rural County 169
(37.1)
8
(13.1)
45
(30.2)
26
(37.7)
66
(66.7)
N/A
Ambulatory Surgery 127
(21.8)
92
60.1
16
9.7
7
9.2
7
6.6
2
(11.8)
  Urban County 112
(88.2)
80
(87.0)
13
(81.3)
7
(100.0)
7
(100.0)
2
(100.0)
.699
  Rural County 15
(11.8)
12
(13.0)
3
(18.7)
N/A N/A N/A
Annual Volume, mean (SD) 127
(201)
349
(224)
75
(89)
38
(193)
14
(38)
219
(162)
< .001
  Urban County 154
(217)
345
(224)
40
(88)
50
(234)
29
(57)
219
(162)
  Rural County 61
(144)
377
(225)
86
(92)
14
(56)
5
(13)
N/A
a

Includes providers not classified in 1 of the 5 predominant medical specialties providing colonoscopies.

b

P values calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis for volume and Chi-square and Fisher Exact test for proportion comparisons.

c

Overall annual volume is based on data from any location where colonoscopy was provided by each provider, and annual volume at the primary office setting is based on data for all colonoscopies performed at the location in which the majority of procedures were performed. Volume calculations based on data from all patients served aged 50–74, including out-of-state patients and all colonoscopy indications (ie, surveillance, screening, and diagnostic).