Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2018 Mar 15;168:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.03.006

Figure 3. Average hourly sucrose preference ratio (sucrose intake/total fluid intake) and daily sucrose consumption in groups of mice that drank water (control) or had a prior history of 1, 3, or 6 cycles of DID.

Figure 3

A prior history of binge-like ethanol drinking did not alter sucrose preference during the anhedonia test (A). No effect of ethanol experience was observed on sucrose consumption, but animals with access to 6% sucrose consumed more sucrose than the other concentrations (B). Moreover, all animals preferred the sweet taste of high concentration of sucrose (6%) more than either of the other two concentrations regardless of DID history (C). All values are means ± SEM.