Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 30;34(5):725–734. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1285-x

Table 1.

Echocardiographic parameters of the LV and RV

Parameter Mean ± SD p value
NH&PI CC
Left ventricle
 IVSWTd (mm) 10 ± 1 9 ± 1 0.006*
 PWTd (mm) 10 ± 1 9 ± 1 0.012*
 LVIDd [mm/(m2)0.5] 37 ± 3 38 ± 2 0.229
 LVIDs [mm/(m2)0.5] 26 ± 2 26 ± 2 0.878
 LV mass [g/(m2)2.7] 42 ± 9 37 ± 4 0.017*
 MWT (mm) 10 ± 0.7 9 ± 0.4 < 0.001*
 RWT 0.35 ± 0.04 0.31 ± 0.03 0.003*
 LVEDV [ml/(m2)1.5] 47 ± 8 47 ± 7 0.873
 LVESV [ml/(m2)1.5] 19 ± 4 20 ± 4 0.566
 LV SV (ml) 94 ± 19 89 ± 13 0.27
 LV EF (%) 59 ± 4 58 ± 5 0.515
 Septal S′ (cm/s) 9 ± 1.3 9.3 ± 1.1 0.378
 Septal E′ (cm/s) 11.7 ± 1.5 12.5 ± 2.4 0.191
 Septal A′ (cm/s) 7.5 ± 1.6 7.8 ± 1.6 0.575
 Lateral S′ (cm/s) 11.5 ± 2.9 11.6 ± 2.4 0.861
 Lateral E′ (cm/s) 17 ± 3.4 18.5 ± 2.7 0.108
 Lateral A′ (cm/s) 7.7 ± 2.7 6.6 ± 2 0.120
Right ventricle
 RVOTPLAX index [mm/(m2)0.5] 23 ± 2 23 ± 2 0.981
 RVOT1 index [mm/(m2)0.5] 23 ± 3 24 ± 3 0.476
 RVOT2 index [mm/(m2)0.5] 18 ± 2 19 ± 3 0.212
 RVD1 index [mm/(m2)0.5] 29 ± 2 30 ± 4 0.229
 RVD2 index [mm/(m2)0.5] 23 ± 3 21 ± 3 0.085
 RVD3 index [mm/(m2)0.5] 56 ± 13 62 ± 6 0.054
 RVDa Index (cm/m2) 13 ± 2 13 ± 2 0.399
 RVSa Index (cm/m2) 7 ± 1 7 ± 2 0.809
 RVWT (mm) 5 ± 1 4 ± 1 0.016*
 TAPSE (mm) 24 ± 4 25 ± 4 0.742
 RVFAC (%) 47 ± 6 49 ± 7.2 0.365
 RV S′ (cm/s) 15 ± 2 14 ± 2 0.442
 RV E′ (cm/s) 14 ± 3 15 ± 3 0.27
 RV A′ (cm/s) 11 ± 2 10 ± 3 0.161

LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle, NH&PI Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islanders, CC Caucasian Controls, d at end-diastole, s at end-systole, IVSWT interventricular septal wall thickness, PWT posterior wall thickness, LVID LV internal diameter, MWT mean wall thickness, RWT relative wall thickness, LVEDV LV end-diastolic volume, LVESV LV end-systolic volume, SV stroke volume, EF ejection fraction, RVOT RV outflow tract, RVD RV dimension, RVDa RV area at end-diastole, RVSa RV area at end-systole, RVWT RV wall thickness, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RVFAC RV fractional area change

*p < 0.05 NH&PI versus CC