Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 20;18(2):375–388. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0576-6

Table 4.

Parameter estimates of the multilevel model investigating the relation between postcorrect RZI and postcorrect RT

Fixed Effects Estimate SE 95% CI t Value (df) p Value Bootstrapped 95% CI Random Effects
Intercept 6.184 .015 [6.179, 6.188] 426.45 (47.0) <.001 [6.156, 6.210] σe2 Residual .063
Postcorrect IBI .0054 .002 [.0047, .0061] 2.40 (20620) .016 [.0017, .0100] σ02 Intercept .010
Postcorrect
RZI
– .0025 .002 [– .0030, – .0019] – 1.35 (45) .185 [– .006, .001] σ12 Postcorrect RZI .00002
Precorrect RT .0233 .004 [.0222, .0244] 5.94 (63) <.001 [.017, .028] σ22 Precorrect RT .0005
Task .4179 .019 [.4124, .4234] 21.53 (47) <.001 [.384, .461] σ32 Task .017
Postcorrect RZI * Postcorrect IBI – .0048 .001 [– .0052, – .0044] – 3.46 (20840) <.001 [– .0076, .0012]
Postcorrect RZI * Precorrect RT .0055 .002 [.0050, .0059] 3.35 (21790) <.001 [– .0018, .0058]
Task *
Postcorrect IBI
.0107 .003 [.0097, .0116] 3.16 (22490) .002 [.0025, .0185]
Task * Precorrect RT .0092 .003 [.0082, .0101] 2.72 (22500) .007 [– .002, .021]

IBI = interbeat interval, RT = reaction time, RZI = RZ interval