Table 2.

Evaluation of quality of SP’s roleplaying (students). (Scale: 1 = “very good” to 5 = “very bad”)

Items	N	NMISS	Min	Q1	Median	Q3	Max
The SP played his/her role authentically.	527	2	1	1	1	1	4
The SP overacted. (recoded)	527	2	1	1	2	2	4
The SP could be a real patient..	525	4	1	1	2	2	4
The SP stayed in his/her role the whole time.	529	0	1	1	1	1	4
The SP challenged the student.	523	6	1	2	2	2	4
The SP adjusted role on student’s level.	523	6	1	2	2	2	4
The SP’s appearance fitted to the played role.	525	4	1	1	1	2	4