Table 5.
Evaluation of quality of SP’s feedback (teachers). (Scale: 1 = “very good” to 5 = “very bad”)
| Items | N | NMISS | Min | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The SP gave feedback from the patient’s point of view. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| The SP gave feedback regarding the student’s behaviour. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| The SP gave constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| The SP gave examples about good and bad aspects during the conversation. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| The SP said how he/she felt during the conversation. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| The SP communicated with “I-messages”. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| The SP behaved respectfully towards the student. | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |