Table 1.
BIC | Entropy | Class proportions | L-M-R test | L-M-R p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Binge drinking model | |||||
2 classes | 15389.15 | 0.99 | 3.78 96.22 | 274.96 | <0.01 |
3 classes | 15242.77 | 0.97 | 11.21 3.52 85.27 | 155.28 | <0.01 |
4 classes | 15175.08 | 0.95 | 2.82 78.58 9.91 8.69 | 80.79 | 0.68 |
Marijuana use model | |||||
2 classes | 5841.40 | 0.95 | 73.96 26.04 | 300.58 | <0.001 |
3 classes | 5691.71 | 0.95 | 10.89 18.15 70.96 | 158.41 | <0.001 |
4 classes | 5653. 50 | 0.94 | 17.96 69.34 6.63 6.10 | 52.89 | 0.36 |
Note. Model fit is shown for the linear binge drinking model and linear marijuana use model; Model fit was based on the following criteria: 1) Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), with lower numbers indicating better model fit; 2) Entropy closer to 1, which identifies better fitting classification of posterior probability class values; 3) Class estimates based on posterior probabilities consisting of no less than 5% of the total sample, which supports improved replicability; 4) Lo-Mendell-Rubin (LMR) adjusted likelihood ratio test, which compares the fit of the k class model to the k-1 (i.e., 4 versus 3 class model); and 5) Class interpretability.