Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Feb 11;185:198–206. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.015

Table 1.

Growth mixture model fit for binge drinking and marijuana use

BIC Entropy Class proportions L-M-R test L-M-R p-value
Binge drinking model
 2 classes 15389.15 0.99 3.78 96.22 274.96 <0.01
3 classes 15242.77 0.97 11.21 3.52 85.27 155.28 <0.01
 4 classes 15175.08 0.95 2.82 78.58 9.91 8.69   80.79   0.68
Marijuana use model
 2 classes 5841.40 0.95 73.96 26.04 300.58 <0.001
3 classes 5691.71 0.95 10.89 18.15 70.96 158.41 <0.001
 4 classes 5653. 50 0.94 17.96 69.34 6.63 6.10   52.89   0.36

Note. Model fit is shown for the linear binge drinking model and linear marijuana use model; Model fit was based on the following criteria: 1) Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), with lower numbers indicating better model fit; 2) Entropy closer to 1, which identifies better fitting classification of posterior probability class values; 3) Class estimates based on posterior probabilities consisting of no less than 5% of the total sample, which supports improved replicability; 4) Lo-Mendell-Rubin (LMR) adjusted likelihood ratio test, which compares the fit of the k class model to the k-1 (i.e., 4 versus 3 class model); and 5) Class interpretability.