Table 1.
Relationship between resilience, precautionary behaviour, deliberate risk taking, change in performance time (HotSolo vs HotH2H) and change in end-exercise T re (HotSolo vs HotH2H)
| B | SE | β | T | LLCI | ULCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆ performance time (s) | 379.71 | 79.48 | 4.78** | 209.24 | 550.18 | |
| CD-RISC | − 9.41 | 3.15 | − 0.64 | − 2.99* | − 16.16 | − 2.66 |
| PB | − 6.89 | 4.31 | − 0.25 | − 1.60 | − 16.14 | 2.36 |
| DRT | − 4.30 | 5.41 | − 0.16 | − 0.79 | − 15.90 | 7.30 |
| ∆ end-exercise T re (°C) | − 1.12 | 0.430 | − 0.260 | − 2.04 | − 0.19 | |
| CD-RISC | 0.009 | 0.017 | 0.104 | 0.505 | − 0.02 | 0.05 |
| PB | 0.014 | 0.023 | 0.087 | 0.580 | − 0.03 | 0.06 |
| DRT | 0.117 | 0.029 | 0.784 | 3.982** | 0.05 | 0.18 |
CD-RISC Connor–Davidson resilience scale, DRT deliberate risk taking, HotSolo a 20-km time trial undertaken in a hot environment; HotH2H a 20-km simulated head-to-head competition in a hot environment, LLCI lower level confidence interval, PB precautionary behaviour, T re rectal temperature, ULCI upper level confidence interval; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01