Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 11;71:236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.017

Table 1.

Patients selected for the study. In the last column of the table, the clinical outcome in terms of paravalvular leakage (PVL) is reported. RCC = right coronary cusp; LCC = left coronary cusp; NCC = non-coronary cusp.

Patient Age at TAVR Gender Sapien XT device [mm] Post-TAVR fluoroscopy diameter [mm] Paravalvular leakage
1 85 M 29 25.3 trivial in NCC
2 77 M 29 27.1 trivial in NCC
3 78 M 26 26.3 trivial in NCC
4 59 F 26 23.2 trivial in RCC
5 69 F 26 23.7 1 trivial jet in RCC-LCC, 1 trivial jet in NCC
6 76 M 26 25.0 No PVL
7 85 M 26 25.1 trivial in RCC, almost absent
8 78 M 26 25.4 1 mild jet in RCC, 1 trivial jet in NCC
9 88 F 23 21.4 1 trivial jet LCC-NCC, 1 mild+ jet RCC-NCC
10 83 M 29 25.5 trivial in NCC-RCC
11 78 F 26 22.7 trivial in RCC-LCC
12 83 M 26 25.6 trivial
13 81 M 29 26.4 1 mild jet in RCC, 1 trivial jet in RCC-NCC
14 90 F 26 23.5 No PVL