Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 16;12:70. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00070

Table 1.

Connection density.

Threshold WBN (264) SMN (35) CON (14) Aud. (13) DMN (58) Vis. (31) FPN (25) SAN (18) Sub. (13) VAN (9) DAN (11)
0.15 52.97 67.67 N\A 70.25 72.10 N\A 72.10 73.76 N\A 70.66 N\A
0.2 40.60 57.90 N\A 59.56 63.06 75.23 63.03 64.50 78.90 61.81 65.19
0.25 30.43 49.04 61.77 50.40 54.42 68.01 54.40 55.07 70.14 51.56 N\A
0.3 22.40 41.11 53.64 41.03 46.13 60.77 46.02 46.53 60.92 N\A N\A
0.35 16.25 34.07 45.26 33.31 38.59 53.04 38.30 38.45 51.47 N\A N\A
0.4 11.61 27.80 37.29 N\A 31.53 45.30 30.85 31.37 42.52 N\A N\A
0.45 N\A N\A N\A N\A 25.24 37.86 N\A N\A 33.79 N\A N\A
0.5 N\A N\A N\A N\A 19.93 31.25 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.55 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A 25.66 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.6 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.65 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.7 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.75 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.8 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A
0.85 N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A N\A

Average connection density (%; i.e., actual number of edges in a graph relative to the total number of possible edges) across participants is listed for all networks at all thresholds (Fisher transformed r). The number of regions in a network is indicated below each network name. Note that the thresholds at which small word property of a network was not estimable and was not presented were not included in the following analyses and are marked by N\A (see Figure 1). Other conventions are as in Figure 1.