Table 3. Quality ratings of four studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Study | Sample Described (2) |
Inclusion/ Exclusion (2) |
Task Described (3) |
Measurement Described (1) |
Summary Statistics (1) |
Reliability (1) | Total (10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohannon (2017) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Bohannon (2015) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Priya & Verma (2015) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| White et al. (2014) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
*Items and scoring: 1) Sample adequately described: type, enrollment noted as consecutive or timeframe indicated, 2) Participant inclusion/exclusion criteria explicit, 3) Task described: instructions, feedback, course, 4) Measurement adequately described: criterion measure 5) Summary statistics (mean/median, SD/SE/range/ confidence inetrvals) provided, 6) Reliability of measures reported.