Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;8:5698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23739-y

Table 2.

Identification of CFD-associated DNAs in different samples by PCR amplification.

Sample 1988–1989, palm ID/(sample No)a 2013b
DNA cfd2 + cfd3 (3 + 6) cfd4 + MRD25–21A (7 + 8) MRD19 + MRD20 (9 + 32) MRD37.14 (10 + 11) MRD cagedc(22 + 23) TT17–7 + 12–86–14 + 12-86-15 (24 + 26) one MRD palm, 11 leaves
CFDV DNA-S.1 + + + + + + +
CFDV DNA-S.2 + +
CFDV DNA-gamma + + + + + + +
CFDAR + + + + + + +
CFDA1 + + +
CFDA2 + + +
CFDA3 + + +
CFDA4 + + + +
CFDA5 + + +
CFDA6 + + +
CFDA7 + +
CFDA8 + +

aTwo samples (indicated in  brackets) of virions prepared from one or several palms (indicated at the top; see Table S1) were pooled. DNA was subjected to RCA amplification followed by PCR using the specific primers indicated in Table S3.

bTotal DNA of samples prepared from eleven individual symptomatic leaves of a single severely diseased palm were pooled and subjected to RCA amplification that was followed by PCR using specific primers.

cCaged plants experimentally infected by viruliferous Myndus taffini.