Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;72(8):2359–2367. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx133

Table 2.

Invasive fungal disease rates

Patient population L-AMB Placebo P valuea
IFD assessment by IDRB N= 228 N= 111
Proven or probable IFD (primary endpoint) 18 (7.9%) 13 (11.7%) 0.24
  proven candidaemia 1 (0.4%)b 3 (2.7%)c 0.07
  proven filamentous IFD 0 0
  probable IFD 17 (7.5%) 10 (9.0%) 0.60
Possible IFD 11 (4.8%) 6 (5.4%) 0.82
Pulmonary infiltrates 46 (20.2%) 30 (27.0%) 0.15
Deaths due to IFD 2 (0.9%)d 0 0.32
IFD assessment by investigator N= 228 N= 111
Proven or probable IFD 25 (11.0%) 12 (10.8%) 0.97
Requirement for antifungal treatment 37 (16.2%) 24 (21.6%) 0.22
Deaths due to IFD 2 (0.9%) 0 0.32
Post hoc analysis on patients without major protocol deviationse N= 184 N= 90
Proven or probable IFD 14 (7.6%) 13 (14.4%) 0.07
Neutropenic for ≥10 days (ANC <500 cells/μL) N= 174 N= 84
Proven or probable IFD 12 (6.9%) 11 (13.1%) 0.10

ANC, absolute neutrophil count.

Three subjects (one L-AMB, two placebo) had Pneumocystis spp. in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and were not considered to have IFD as it is not part of the EORTC/MSG criteria.

a

Stratum-adjusted (stratified by region) CMH test.

b

C. kefyr.

c

C. albicans (2×), C. tropicalis bloodstream infections.

d

Probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, proven candidaemia.

e

Major protocol deviations were protocol-prohibited systemic antifungals, baseline IFD or chemotherapy not expected to induce sufficient neutropenia.