Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Nov 9;9(10):1012–1016. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012751

Table 2.

Characteristics of perfusion imaging-based treatment studies in the meta-analysis

Study Design Sample size Max time window (hours) Age Baseline NIHSS Time to rescan (hours) Recanalization (%) Symptomatic ICH (%)






PI Control PI Control PI Control PI Control PI Control PI Control
Bivard et al, 201510 Prospective cohort 366 396 4.5 4.5 73 74 14 12 24 NR NR 5 5
García-Bermejo et al, 201211 Prospective case controlled 43 172 No limitation (range 4.5–14; 16 patients unknown onset) 4.5 69 72 9 11 1, 2, 24 65 77 4.7 2.3
Jovin et al, 201112 Retrospective cohort 198 121 8–26; 14 patients unknown onset 6 65 64 15 17 NR 74 66 10 10
Morelli et al, 201513 Prospective cohort 27 143 Unknown onset 4.5 72.2 71.3 11.9 11.4 NR NR NR 0 3.4
Obach et al, 201114 Prospective cohort 106 262 4.5 3 73.3 73 9 10 NR NR NR 5 7
Prabhakaran et al, 201415 Retrospective cohort 76 138 8 8 74.4* 64.4 18 19 NR 62.5* 47.1 5.3 12.3
Rai et al, 201316 Retrospective cohort 99 430 No limitation (range 3–9) 3–8§ 69 67
68.1
63.5*
17 20.1*§
19.1*§
17.6§
NR 55.6 27.7
68
81.6*
NR NR
Sztriha et al, 201117 Prospective cohort 79 157 3–6 3 74 74 13 14 24 NR NR 4 3
*

p<0.05.

Median value reported instead of mean value.

Control from PROACT-II trial patients who were randomized to treatment group.

§

Control from MERCI, Multi-MERCI, Penumbra pivotal trials, respectively.

ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NR, not reported; PI, perfusion imaging group.