Table 1. POInT estimates for different datasets and ancestral orders.
Description | Ancestral locia | # breaksb | #double breaksc | WGD-bf lnLd | Fixation rate (γ)e | Bias strength (ε)f |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At-α, Full: C. violacea order | 7243 | 6614 | 3021 | -25357.46 | 0.160 | 0.538 |
At-α, Full: Optimized order | 7243 | 5468 | 1129 | -24497.04 | 0.169 | 0.645 |
At-α, High-synteny: C. violacea order | 4556 | 3544 | 1039 | -12837.67 | 0.205 | 0.718 |
At-α, High-synteny: Optimized order | 4556 | 2266 | 252 | -12442.51 | 0.220 | 0.786 |
Grass ρ, Pineapple order | 3091 | 4387 | 2299 | -8822.89 | 0.049 | 0.400 |
Grass ρ, Optimized order | 3091 | 2457 | 434 | -8199.10 | 0.061 | 0.730 |
Yeast WGD | 4065 | 4346 | 796 | -19374.10 | 0.137 | 0.955g |
a: Number of ancestral loci studied.
b: Number of synteny breaks across the polyploid genomes.
c: Number of cases where both parental subgenomes showed a synteny break after an ancestral locus (see Methods).
d: ln-likelihood from fitting WGD-bf to this ancestral order.
e: Maximum likelihood estimate of the relative duplicate fixation rate for this ancestral order (see Fig 2).
f: Maximum likelihood estimate of the relative rate of retention from the more fractionated subgenome for this ancestral order (see Fig 2).
g: ε not significantly different from 1.0; see Fig 2.