Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 28;14(3):e1007267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007267

Table 1. POInT estimates for different datasets and ancestral orders.

Description Ancestral locia # breaksb #double breaksc WGD-bf lnLd Fixation rate (γ)e Bias strength (ε)f
At-α, Full: C. violacea order 7243 6614 3021 -25357.46 0.160 0.538
At-α, Full: Optimized order 7243 5468 1129 -24497.04 0.169 0.645
At-α, High-synteny: C. violacea order 4556 3544 1039 -12837.67 0.205 0.718
At-α, High-synteny: Optimized order 4556 2266 252 -12442.51 0.220 0.786
Grass ρ, Pineapple order 3091 4387 2299 -8822.89 0.049 0.400
Grass ρ, Optimized order 3091 2457 434 -8199.10 0.061 0.730
Yeast WGD 4065 4346 796 -19374.10 0.137 0.955g

a: Number of ancestral loci studied.

b: Number of synteny breaks across the polyploid genomes.

c: Number of cases where both parental subgenomes showed a synteny break after an ancestral locus (see Methods).

d: ln-likelihood from fitting WGD-bf to this ancestral order.

e: Maximum likelihood estimate of the relative duplicate fixation rate for this ancestral order (see Fig 2).

f: Maximum likelihood estimate of the relative rate of retention from the more fractionated subgenome for this ancestral order (see Fig 2).

g: ε not significantly different from 1.0; see Fig 2.