Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0195591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195591

Table 2. Allelic diversity of the European plum germplasm evaluated in this study.

SSR locus LG Motif  AP AO AM AE A<1% A<5%
UDP96-005 1 (AC)16TG(CT)2CA(CT)11 112 (6.25) 35 4.19 13.82 2.86 40.00
CPPCT-029 1 (CT)24 36 (29.06) 17 3.34 6.11 0.00 41.18
UDP96-008 3 (CA)23 34 (34.09) 8 3.67 4.88 12.50 12.50
BPPCT-039 3 (GA)20 101 (9.02) 36 4.83 13.19 22.22 44.44
pchgms-2 4 (CT)24 72 (10.76) 19 3.59 6.87 10.53 42.11
CPSCT-005 4 (CT)15 90 (9.70) 25 3.89 8.38 20.00 52.00
UDP98-412 6 (AG)28 79 (16.66) 21 4.28 7.70 14.29 33.33
BPPCT-025 6 (GA)29 100 (8.80) 39 4.34 13.73 10.26 53.85
CPPCT-033 7 (CT)16 80 (14.91) 18 4,38 9.16 0.00 11.11
CPSCT-026 7 (CT)16 101 (12.59) 23 4.89 11.36 8.70 21.74
UDP98-409 8 (AG)19 62 (14.06) 16 2.74 6.17 12.50 37.50
Mean 78.82 23.36 4.01 9.21 10.35 35.43

AP, allelic phenotypes pointing out in brackets the frequency of the most common variant

AO, number of observed alleles

AM, mean number of alleles per genotype

AE, effective number of alleles

AR, number of alleles present in <1% and <5% of genotypes (as percentages of the total number of alleles for each SSR).