Incorporating multiple schistosome species and their hybrids |
Extension of existing (e.g., worm burden) model frameworks to incorporate multiple schistosome genotypes and hybridization mechanisms
Use of diagnostic tests that enable collection of molecular material which permit subsequent laboratory analysis to distinguish schistosome genotypes
Use of multilocus techniques that enable identification of sexual direction of hybridization
|
Incorporating multiple definitive host species |
Epidemiological studies in livestock and wildlife populations
Sampling to include both faeces and urine specimens from livestock species
Adaptation and validation of existing diagnostic tests for animal schistosomes in Africa
|
Necessity for model to incorporate heterogeneities and mating interactions between schistosome species and their hybrids |
|
Parameterizing multihost transmission dynamics and estimating zoonotic spillover |
Collection of field data on livestock population densities and egg‐shedding rates
Use of currently available laboratory techniques to identify F1‐type hybrids, for example multilocus techniques
Further development of laboratory techniques such as whole‐genome sequencing, to better track “who acquires infection from whom”
|
Characterizing heterogeneities in “fitness” traits that may influence transmission rates of hybrids vs “pure” schistosome species and how these traits may be changing in response to evolutionary pressure |
|
Quantification of spillover contribution of different livestock species |
|