Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2000 Mar;122(3):793–802. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.3.793

Detoxification of Arsenic by Phytochelatins in Plants1

Marcus EV Schmöger 1,2, Matjaz Oven 1,2, Erwin Grill 1,*
PMCID: PMC58915  PMID: 10712543

Abstract

As is a ubiquitous element present in the atmosphere as well as in the aquatic and terrestrial environments. Arsenite and arsenate are the major forms of As intoxication, and these anions are readily taken up by plants. Both anions efficiently induce the biosynthesis of phytochelatins (PCs) ([γ-glutamate-cysteine]n-glycine) in vivo and in vitro. The rapid induction of the metal-binding PCs has been observed in cell suspension cultures of Rauvolfia serpentina, in seedlings of Arabidopsis, and in enzyme preparations of Silene vulgaris upon challenge to arsenicals. The rate of PC formation in enzyme preparations was lower compared with Cd-induced biosynthesis, but was accompanied by a prolonged induction phase that resulted finally in higher peptide levels. An approximately 3:1 ratio of the sulfhydryl groups from PCs to As is compatible with reported As-glutathione complexes. The identity of the As-induced PCs and of reconstituted metal-peptide complexes has unequivocally been demonstrated by electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy. Gel filtration experiments and inhibitor studies also indicate a complexation and detoxification of As by the induced PCs.


As is a toxic element ubiquitously encountered in the environment and in organisms (Cullen and Reimer, 1989). Substantial amounts of As are released by geological activities and by anthropogenic impacts such as smelting operations and fossil fuel combustion, accounting for 1.2 × 104 to 2.6 × 104 tons of emission into the atmosphere (Nriagu and Pacyna, 1988; Ochiai, 1995). For instance, widespread groundwater pollution by As compounds has drawn considerable attention and raised serious concern in Bangladesh and other locations (Dhar et al., 1997; Kaiser, 1998).

As poisoning is known to interfere with the cell's sulfhydryl groups. In humans, the toxicity of trivalent As is mainly due to its binding to the sulfhydryl groups of lipoic acid (Webb, 1966; Kalef and Gitler, 1994). Therefore, As intoxication can be ameliorated by the administration of dithiols such as 2,3-dimercaptopropanol or 1,2-ethanedithiol (Webb and van Heyningen, 1947; Whittaker, 1947), which compete for As binding.

In mammals (Lakso and Peoples, 1975; Aposhian, 1997), fungi, and algae (Edmonds and Francesconi, 1981; Cullen and Reimer, 1989), detoxification of As usually involves methylation and other biotransformations such as incorporation of As into organic molecules by the formation of e.g. arsenocholine, arsenobetaine, or arsenosugars. In bacteria, a widespread tolerance mechanism for arsenate, AsVO43−, is based on an efflux system that exports arsenic specifically and ATP-dependently as AsIIIO2 from the cell generated by cytosolic reduction (Silver, 1996). At least in terrestrial higher plants, these processes seem to form no major routes of detoxification (Nissen and Benson, 1982).

Plants face arsenical compounds mainly in the form of the anions arsenite and arsenate; the latter competes with phosphate and is readily taken up (Warren et al., 1964). Both anions have been reported to trigger the formation of phytochelatins (PCs) in plants (Grill et al., 1987; Maitani et al., 1996).

PCs are heavy-metal-binding peptides derived from glutathione (GSH) and have the general structure (γ-Glu-Cys)n-Gly (n = 2–11) (Grill et al., 1985; Zenk, 1996). Their biosynthesis is due to the transpeptidation of γ-glutamylcysteinyl dipeptides from GSH by the action of a constitutively present PC synthase (Grill et al., 1989; Chen et al., 1997). Recently, the gene encoding PC synthase has been cloned by several laboratories (Clemens et al., 1999; Ha et al., 1999; Vatamaniuk et al., 1999). PC synthase is activated by heavy metal ions such as Cd2+, Cu2+, Ag+, Hg2+, and Pb2+, which are characterized as class B and borderline elements (Nieboer and Richardson, 1980). Subsequently, these ions are complexed by the induced PCs via thiolate coordination (Grill et al., 1985; Grill, 1989; Strasdeit et al., 1991; Mehra et al., 1995, 1996a, 1996b; Mehra and Mulchandani, 1995; Salt et al., 1995; Pickering et al., 1999).

Since the immobilized metals are less toxic than the free ions, PCs are considered to be part of the detoxifying mechanism of higher plants (Grill et al., 1985; Zenk, 1996), algae (Gekeler et al., 1988), and some fungi (Kondo et al., 1985; Kneer et al., 1992). This concept is supported by inhibitor studies (Grill et al., 1987; Reese and Wagner, 1987; Gussarsson et al., 1996), biochemical studies (Kneer and Zenk, 1992), and mutant analyses (Mutoh and Hayashi, 1988; Howden and Cobbett, 1992; Howden et al., 1995, Ha et al., 1999). The analysis of a PC-deficient Arabidopsis mutant showed a detoxifying role for PCs, at least for Cd2+ and Hg2+ (Howden and Cobbett, 1992). Furthermore, PCs appear to be involved in the homeostasis of Zn2+ and Cu+/Cu2+ by providing a transient storage form for the ions (Grill et al., 1988; Thumann et al., 1991).

Under the premises of a detoxifying role of the metal-binding peptides a sequestration of As compounds by induced PCs has been implied (Grill et al., 1987). This assumption is supported by in vitro experiments that documented the formation of complexes between GSH and As compounds (Jocelyn, 1972; Scott et al., 1993; Gailer and Lindner, 1998). In addition, Arabidopsis and Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutants lacking PC synthase activity display an enhanced sensitivity toward arsenate (Ha et al., 1999).

More surprising were data by Maitani et al. (1996) that failed to demonstrate an As-PC complex. The result could indicate that PCs do not fulfill a detoxifying function during As poisoning. This challenging finding prompted us to examine the cellular role of PCs during As poisoning in plants. We report the unequivocal induction of PCs by As in vivo and in vitro and provide clear evidence for the formation of As-PC complexes, in accordance with a detoxifying role for the peptides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Material

Rauvolfia serpentina Benth. ex Kurz and Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke cell suspension cultures were cultivated as reported previously (Grill et al., 1987). For experiments, 6 g (fresh weight) of cells were diluted into 30 mL of fresh medium (Linsmaier and Skoog, 1965). Three days after transfer, cells were treated with different concentrations of As or Cd (three replicates each). In the inhibitor studies, buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) (Griffith and Meister, 1979) was added 3 h before heavy metal administration to the cell suspension cultures. After 4 d of exposure, cells were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen for PC analysis by HPLC (Grill et al., 1987).

Seeds of Arabidopsis (L.) Heynh. (ecotype RLD) were surface-sterilized with ethanol and NaOCl (Estelle and Somerville, 1987) and placed on solidified Murashige and Skoog medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). Plates were stored vertically at 22°C with an illumination of 100 μmol m−2 s−1 and a light/dark cycle of 16/8 h. One-week-old seedlings were transferred onto solidified Murashige and Skoog medium containing different concentrations of As or Cd ions. Growth of seedlings was determined by a root growth assay (Estelle and Somerville, 1987). Two weeks after transfer the plants were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen for PC and protein (Bradford, 1976) analyses.

Chemicals Used

All chemicals were of the highest grade available from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Metal salts used in the experiments were Cd(NO3)2, NaAsO2, and Na2HAsO4.

In Vitro PC Synthase Assay

The purification procedure for PC synthase from S. vulgaris cells was according to the method of Friederich et al. (1998). Cells were filtered and treated with liquid nitrogen, extracted in 10 mm Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, containing 10 mm β-mercaptoethanol (standard buffer), centrifuged for 30 min (10,000g, 4°C), and filtered. After the 15% (w/v) ammonium sulfate precipitation, the cell-free extract was clarified by centrifugation (30 min, 10,000g), and chromatographed on a phenyl sepharose column (CL-4B, Pharmacia, Uppsala). Column-bound proteins were washed and eluted with standard buffer containing 10% (w/v) ethylene glycol and fractionized. Fractions with enzymatic activity were detected by analysis for PCs synthesized (Grill et al., 1989), pooled, and subsequently dialyzed against standard buffer prior to the in vitro experiments.

All in vitro experiments were carried out in a reaction volume of 2 mL in a tightly closed reaction tube (Eppendorf Scientific, Hamburg, Germany). The assay contained approximately 0.5 nkat of PC synthase and variable concentrations of GSH and As from 1 to 50 mm and 0.1 to 1 mm, respectively, buffered at pH 8.0. EDTA (5 mm) was included in the enzyme assay to complex bivalent cations such as Cu2+ and Zn2+, which are present in the extract and can otherwise provide a residual PC synthase activity.

Reconstitution of As-GSH and As-PC Complexes

Complexes of GSH and As were generated by incubating an aqueous solution of the tripeptide with arsenite under nitrogen to prevent oxidation, as described in Scott et al. (1993). PC2-arsenite complexes were obtained in vitro by the procedure replacing GSH for the pentapeptide. The concentrations of peptide (10 mm) and metalloid resulted in a stoichiometry of one As to three thiol groups.

As Determination

The As content was quantified by atomic absorption spectroscopy of the samples in the graphite furnace mode at 193.7 nm (model 1100B spectrometer, Perkin-Elmer/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

PC Analysis

PC determination was by HPLC analysis and post-column derivatization essentially as previously described (Kneer and Zenk, 1997; Friederich et al., 1998). However, we used freshly prepared NaBH4 solution (1 mg/mL) in double-distilled water instead of sodium hydroxide solution and a prolonged incubation time for reduction (10 min).

Gel Filtration Analysis

Gel filtration analyses were performed on a fast-protein liquid chromatograph (BioLogic, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) equipped with a column (1.6 × 64 cm) containing Sephadex G-25 (Pharmacia). The chromatography was carried out in the presence of either 10 mm Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) or 10 mm sodium acetate (pH 4.0) in 100 mm NaCl solution. Cell-free extracts were prepared by thawing cells in a one-half volume of buffer (10 mm Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, or 10 mm sodium acetate, pH 4.0) and subsequent centrifugation of the slurry at 10,000g for 30 min at 4°C. Eight milliliters of the supernatant was applied to the column and eluted at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Fractions of the eluate (2-mL fraction size) were tested for As and PC levels.

Purification of PCs for Mass Spectroscopic Analysis

Cell-free extracts of the R. serpentina cells were prepared and chromatographed on a Sephadex G-25 column as mentioned above. Fractions containing PCs were concentrated by partial lyophilization and isolated by HPLC with UV detection at 220 nm (Grill et al., 1991). PC fractions were lyophilized and just before electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) analysis diluted to an approximate concentration of 0.1 mg/mL with 10% (v/v) acetonitrile in water. The analysis was performed on a MAT LCQ instrument (Finnigan, San Jose, CA).

RESULTS

PC Formation in Vivo

In general, PC biosynthesis is triggered by heavy metal cations such as Cd2+ and Zn2+. The induction of PCs by the anion arsenate has been observed in a survey for peptide-inducing metal ions (Grill et al., 1987), and suggests a unique mode of PC synthase activation. To substantiate the previous finding, the arsenate- and arsenite-triggered induction characteristics of PC peptides were investigated in detail with R. serpentina suspension cells. As outlined in Figure 1A, arsenite treatment (100 μm) resulted in the pronounced formation of PC2, PC3, and trace amounts of PC4 and PC5, as concluded from HPLC analysis for sulfhydryl groups. A comparable pattern of PC formation was observed in arsenate-treated cells (data not shown) and is characteristic of many other PC-inducing metal ions (Grill et al., 1987). The retention times of the PC peaks in the analysis perfectly correlated with peaks of PC standards and of extracts of cells treated with 100 μm Cd2+ (Fig. 1B), while in extracts of cells cultivated in metal-free medium, these fractions were not detected (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PC analysis of extracts of R. serpentina. The elution profiles of cell extracts treated for 4 d with 100 μm AsO2 (A), 100 μm Cd2+ (B), or without metal (control, C) with sulfhydryl group-specific detection. The peaks indicated by arrows are: glutathione γECG (GSH), (γEC)2G (PC2), (γEC)3G (PC3), and (γEC)4G (PC4).

A difference between As and Cd-challenged cells was the abundance of individual PC peptides: the dominant species was PC2 in the presence of arsenite, whereas PC3 prevailed in the presence of Cd ions. The predominance of the PC2 peptides was also observed with arsenate-treated cells and occurred over the whole concentration range of arsenite and arsenate tested (data not shown). In contrast to Cd, arsenite or arsenate treatment did not lead to a significant depletion of the GSH pool. The toxic action of both As species is indicated by the growth reduction of R. serpentina compared with untreated cell suspension cultures, and was evident above 30 and 10 μm arsenite and arsenate concentrations, respectively (Fig. 2). Optimal PC induction levels were observed at growth-inhibitory and sublethal concentrations of inducers, as previously reported for Cd (Grill et al., 1986, 1987).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dependence of growth and PC production on arsenite and arsenate. R. serpentina cell cultures were cultivated in the presence of varying concentrations of arsenite (AsO2) (A) or arsenate (AsO43−) (B) for 4 d. Growth is expressed as the gain of biomass of the inoculum (10 g dry weight/L). The analysis was performed in triplicate.

The maximal yield of PCs was observed at 100 μm arsenite and 30 μm arsenate concentrations, which gave rise to 16 and 6 μmol GluCys units (in PCs per gram dry weight), while growth was inhibited by approximately 50% and 90%, respectively. In comparison, cells treated in parallel without metal contained 0.2 μmol GluCys unit, and treatment with 100 μm Cd2+ produced about 7 μmol GluCys units (in PCs per gram dry weight; data not shown). The induction rates were especially dramatic with arsenite as the inducer, reaching factors of approximately 90-fold at optimal metalloid concentrations. Even at the non-inhibitory level of 30 μm arsenite, an increase in PC levels by a factor of about 25 compared with the untreated control occurred.

Cell-free extracts of 40 μm and 100 μm arsenite-treated Silene cucubalus suspension cultures (4 d) contained substantial levels of PCs and As (0.37 and 0.92 μmol GluCys units in PCs and 0.11 and 0.32 μmol of As per gram fresh weight, respectively), corresponding to an approximate ratio of three thiol groups to 1 As.

A similar toxicity of As was observed in Arabidopsis seedlings (Fig. 3) by using inhibition of root growth and a well-established marker for metal toxicity (Howden and Cobbett, 1992). Root growth was analyzed after transfer of 1-week-old seedlings onto solidified medium containing various concentrations of arsenite for 6 d. A negative effect of arsenite ions on root elongation was visible at a concentration of 10 μm. In Arabidopsis treated with 100 μm arsenite, the roots stopped growing and the seedlings produced more PCs (63 μmol GluCys units in PC/g protein) than after challenge with the same concentration of Cd2+, which is considered to be an optimal PC inducer (Grill et al., 1987) (36 μmol GluCys units in PC/g protein). Again, the strongest PC induction occurred at toxic levels of metalloid reflected by the exertion of growth inhibition. However, the non-inhibiting concentration of 3 μm arsenite resulted in an approximately 100-fold increase of the PC level in unchallenged Arabidopsis seedlings below 0.1 μmol GluCys unit (in PC/g protein).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Root growth and PC content of arsenite-exposed Arabidopsis. One-week-old seedlings were transferred to heavy-metal-containing solidified medium under sterile conditions. Root growth (n = 20) within 6 d after transfer was determined and, after another 8 d, pools of 10 seedlings each (n = 4) were analyzed for protein and PC levels.

To unequivocally confirm the identity of As-induced PC peptides, PC2 and PC3 were isolated from de-proteinated extracts of arsenite-challenged R. serpentina cells by preparative reversed phase-HPLC. Subsequently, the material was subjected to ESI-MS and compared with authentic PC species purified from Cd-treated cells. In both cases, the peptides isolated from As-exposed plant cells generated peak patterns characteristic for penta- and nonameric PC peptides with mass peaks for PC2 (m+H+: 540) (Fig. 4) and for PC3 (m+H+: 772; data not shown). In addition, major signals at molecular masses of 538 and 770, corresponding to the intramolecular oxidation products of PC2 and PC3, respectively, were detected. These signals were shifted to the expected masses of the PC species upon prolonged reduction of the isolated material by borohydride. Thus, the production of PCs represents unequivocally a reaction of plants toward exposure to As ions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ESI-MS spectra of arsenite-induced PCs. PC2 purified from AsO2-treated R. serpentina cells (A) was compared with authentic PC2 (B). The major mass signal in A corresponds to the oxidized pentapeptide (m+H+, 538). The intramolecular oxidation of the sulfhydryl groups has been frequently observed in those preparations. After prolonged reduction of the As-induced PCs, the mass peak of 540, which is identical to the signal of the sulfhydryl-reduced standard (B; m+H+, 540), was generated (not shown).

As-Induced in Vitro Biosynthesis of PCs

The observed induction of PC peptides by As anions could reflect a direct activation of the PC synthase by As compounds, or it could be indirectly triggered by the As-mediated liberation of cellularly complexed heavy metal ions such as Zn2+ and Cu2+, which subsequently activate the synthase. An indirect pathway operates, for example, during the induction of metallothioneins by Mn2+ or Pb2+ (Bracken and Klaassen, 1987). To examine the mechanism of induction, cell-free extracts of S. vulgaris (Grill et al., 1989) have been assayed for PC synthase activity in the presence of EDTA. The rationale of the experiment was to inactivate Zn2+ and Cu2+ present in the enzyme preparation with EDTA, which would not interfere with the anions arsenite and arsenate. Metal analyses of the enzyme preparation revealed levels of Zn2+ and Cu2+ corresponding to 14.4 and 3.1 μm, respectively. Therefore, a millimolar concentration of EDTA would be more than sufficient to efficiently scavenge those ions. The presence of 5 mm EDTA completely excluded any residual activity of PC synthase, while the addition of As anions (up to 1 mm) strongly activated the enzyme (Fig. 5A). PC biosynthesis was detectable in the presence of as little as 10 μm arsenite, however, PC formation was optimal in the concentration range of 1 mm arsenite and 10 mm GSH, yielding 0.75 μmol GluCys unit in PC per minute per gram of protein. The PC formation leveled off after about 24 h, yielding 2.7 mm GluCys moieties incorporated into PCs, which corresponds to a ratio of metal/GluCys of 1 to 2.7 (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Kinetics of in vitro PC biosynthesis. PC formation catalyzed by PC synthase of S. vulgaris (0.5 nkat) in the presence of 1 mm arsenite and 10 mm GSH reaching equilibrium (A) and the initial phase of enzymatic activation (B). Inclusion of 5 mm EDTA in the assay prevented any residual activity of the enzyme (approximately 1% of the level achieved by arsenite activation).

The activation of PC synthase occurred immediately upon administration of the inducer in the initial phase (Fig. 5B), and PCs accumulated linearly over time (for at least 4 h). The induced peptides were isolated and subjected to MS analysis. Signals of mass peaks identical to the data presented in Figure 4A were recorded.

A parallel experiment conducted with 1 mm Cd2+ as an inducing ion yielded a 1.5-fold increased initial rate of PC formation (1.10 μmol GluCys units in PC per minute per gram of protein) compared with the enzyme activation with 1 mm arsenite, although net PC production was finally lower (2 mm GluCys moieties in PC instead of 2.7 mm GluCys moieties in the presence of As).

These results clearly support PC induction by the direct mode of enzymatic activation in vitro.

Evidence for Complexation of As by PC

To determine the existence of an As-PC complex, gel filtration experiments were performed with both in vivo-induced peptides and in vitro-reconstituted complexes. Surprisingly, initial attempts to demonstrate co-chromatography of PCs and As failed under standard pH conditions (pH 8.0; Grill et al., 1985) using arsenite-induced (80 μm, 4 d) extracts of R. serpentina cells (Fig. 6A). Since As is known to undergo oxidation/reduction reactions easily and to form less stable interactions with sulfhydryl groups compared with Cd2+, the chromatographic analysis was carried out with weakly acidic buffers recommended to prevent oxidation and to stabilize As complexes (Jocelyn, 1972). The gel filtration analysis carried out at pH 4.0 revealed co-chromatography of a small fraction of the metalloid with PCs (10%), while the majority of As applied to the column (90%) co-eluted with uncomplexed arsenite (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Gel filtration experiments of arsenite-treated R. serpentina. Cell-free extracts of suspension cells were chromatographed on a Sephadex G25 size exclusion column. The plant material was extracted and analyzed at pH 8.0 (A), pH 4.0 (B), or pH 4.0, and chromatographed in the presence of 5 μm arsenite (C). In the data shown in C, 35% of the applied metalloid coeluted with the PC fraction.

In an attempt to further stabilize the association of As and the induced peptides, a low concentration of arsenite (5 μm) was included in the running buffer during size exclusion chromatography. Indeed, in contrast to the initial gel filtration experiments, 35% of the As level applied by the sample co-eluted with the PC fraction (Fig. 6C). The double-peaked PC elution profile correlated with two peaks of As abundance, which is indicative of a complex formation. The approximately 1:5 ratio of metal to sulfhydryl groups in those fractions was unexpectedly low. Attempts to gain further evidence for a specific binding of As to PCs by purifying the presumed complex were unsuccessful.

Inhibitor studies, however, clearly supported the existence of this complex. In the presence of a specific inhibitor of GSH biosynthesis, 1 mm BSO (Griffith and Meister, 1979), PC induction by 30 μm arsenite was reduced by 75% in R. serpentina cells (Fig. 7) and the GSH concentration was reduced by 50%. Subsequent gel filtration analysis of the cell-free extract performed as above revealed no As co-eluting with the PC fraction (detection level at 0.15 μm metal, which corresponds to 6% of the sample concentration). In addition, the analysis documented an increased toxicity of arsenite in the presence of BSO (Fig. 7). The presence of BSO resulted in complete growth inhibition of 30 μm arsenite-challenged cells, while in the absence of the inhibitor the same metalloid concentration did not negatively affect the growth of the cell culture.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Growth (A) and PC formation (B) of cell cultures from R. serpentina in the absence and presence of the GSH biosynthesis inhibitor BSO. Prior administration of varying concentrations of arsenite to the plant material accounted for 7.4 g dry weight/L, which contained 38.1 μm GSH and 17.7 μm SH-groups in PCs. Growth is expressed as gain of biomass within 4 d. All values are the means of three replicates.

The surprising destabilization of the As-PC complex in alkaline buffer prompted us to reconstitute complexes of As and PC2 or GSH by incubating the peptides in a molar ratio of 3 to 1 with arsenite ions under nitrogen. The samples were analyzed by gel filtration experiments at alkaline or weakly acidic pH values. Fractionation analysis of the As-GSH sample documented a co-elution of the metal with the tripeptide to an extent of 95% and of 43% at pH 4.0 and 8.0, respectively. In agreement with the gel filtration data obtained from in vivo-induced material, a corresponding As-PC2 co-elution was only observed in the weakly acidic buffer (38% metal co-eluted).

The existence of an As-PC2 complex was further supported by MS analysis of the reconstituted complex via ESI-MS. As shown in Figure 8, a mass peak at 1,151 was detected in the reconstituted material that was absent in As-free PC2 samples. This mass peak corresponds exactly to a predicted complex of two PC2 molecules coordinating one As ion via three thiol groups ([γ-Glu-Cys-γ-Glu-Cys-Gly]2As). The additional signals observed at masses of 540 and 612 are generated by metal-free PC2 (compare Fig. 4) and, presumably, by a cationic complex of one PC2 molecule coordinating one As ([γ-Glu-Cys-γ-Glu-Cys-Gly] As+), respectively.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

ESI-MS spectrum of the reconstituted As-PC2 complex. The analysis reveals the characteristic signal of the free PC2 (m+H+ 540) and also of a presumed As-PC2 complex (m+H+ 1,151). The signal at 1,151 corresponds to a protonated complex (m+H+) formed by two molecules of PC2 (molecular mass: 539) ligating one As molecule (atomic mass: 75) via three thiolate coordinations (deprotonated sulfhydryl groups). The structural model (γ-Glu-Cys-γ-Glu-Cys-Gly)2As tentatively proposed would be in agreement with this finding.

DISCUSSION

Structural analyses of PC-metal complexes by EXAFS studies (Strasdeit et al., 1991; Pickering et al., 1999) and optical spectroscopy (Mehra et al., 1995, 1996a, 1996b) have documented a ligandation of Cd2+, Ag+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ by thiolate coordination, as is known for corresponding metallothionein-metal complexes (Kägi, 1991). In the case of the PC-inducing anions arsenate and arsenite, the question of metal coordination is intriguing. The present study unequivocally established the formation of PCs in cell cultures of R. serpentina and in Arabidopsis plants. In addition, enzyme preparations of the PC synthase from S. vulgaris were capable of producing the metal-binding peptides in the presence of the cation chelator EDTA upon challenge with arsenate and arsenite. The in vivo and in vitro biosynthesis of PCs resulted in a stoichiometry of metal to Cys residues provided by PCs of approximately 1 to 3.

The findings imply a direct mode of enzymatic activation and a subsequent sequestration of the As by the formed PCs. Evidence for the complexation of As by PCs stems from MS analysis and from gel filtration studies of cell-free extracts. The PC fraction also contained substantial amounts of As, while extracts of BSO-treated cells revealed both a strongly reduced level of PCs and no detectable co-elution of PCs and metal in the chromatographic analysis.

As-PC complexes were found to be unstable in alkaline buffer solutions but could be stabilized by weak acids, as has been reported for As-GSH complexes (Jocelyn, 1972). NMR structural analyses of As-GSH complexes generated by the incubation of the tripeptide with arsenite revealed a coordination of As3+ by three peptide molecules (Scott et al., 1993). In the presence of arsenate instead of arsenite, the same coordination pattern was observed in vitro due to a reduction of the metalloid ion to As3+ by GSH (Jocelyn, 1972). Therefore, it is conceivable that PCs coordinate the As in the same mode. The formation of a reconstituted As-PC2 complex and the corresponding mass signal identified by ESI-MS analyses is in perfect accordance with the structural model of three thiol groups provided by two PC2 molecules that coordinate one As molecule.

In vivo, compounds with vicinal sulfhydryl groups such as dimercaptopropanol (Webb and van Heyningen, 1947) or peptides with a Cys-Cys-X-X-Cys-Cys motif (Griffin et al., 1998) interact specifically and with high affinity with arsenicals. PCs are multidental sulfhydryl-containing molecules, which is good evidence for a corresponding interaction of As and PCs. In contrast to Cd2+ and Zn2+, As easily undergoes redox reactions. The instability of As-PC complexes observed in vitro possibly reflects the facile oxidation of PCs catalyzed by AsIII/AsV transitions that are favored in alkaline versus acidic conditions and lead to a disruption of the oxidized PC complex. Indeed, a large increase in oxidized sulfhydryl groups was evident in PCs purified from As-treated cells compared with those from Cd-treated cells. The reducing power of PC molecules is much stronger than of GSH and could provide a basis to explain the more stable interaction of As-GSH complexes than As-PC complexes at alkaline conditions. In this context the previously reported failure to identify an As-PC complex by gel filtration in alkaline buffer is conceivable (Maitani et al., 1996).

The reducing environment within the cell, however, where the reduced form of GSH predominates (Hwang et al., 1992), is expected to prevent the oxidational destabilization of the PC-metal complex. The acidic milieu of the vacuole, the presumed final storage compartment for PC-metal complexes (Vögeli-Lange and Wagner, 1990), would also counteract a redox-based destabilization of the complex. Although the direct interaction of As and PCs has not been proven in vivo, the identification of As-PC complexes in cell-free extracts of challenged plant cells, the induction of PCs by As in vivo and in vitro, and reconstitution experiments in vitro strongly argue for the existence of such an complex in planta. The elucidation of the cellular localization and the actual structure of As-PC complexes requires further investigations, e.g. by employing electron probe microscopy (Van Steveninck et al., 1990; Lichtenberger and Neumann, 1997) or whole-cell NMR analysis (Cullen and Hettipathirana, 1994).

Both the documented binding of the metalloid to PCs and the inhibitor study presented here indicate a detoxifying role for PCs. The PCs share with dimercaptopropanol (the antidote of As intoxication) the feature of having vicinal sulfhydryl groups, which are known to provide a more avid complexation of As than monodental sulfhydryl compounds such as GSH (Jocelyn, 1972). Therefore, the inhibition of PC biosynthesis via BSO resulted in a pronounced increase of As toxicity. Furthermore, mutants of Arabidopsis and Schizosaccharomyces pombe deficient in PC synthase activity revealed an enhanced sensitivity toward arsenate (Ha et al., 1999). Conversely, the overexpression of a plant PC synthase in yeast resulted in enhanced resistance to arsenite and arsenate (Vatamaniuk et al., 1999). In light of this evidence, we favor the concept of metal complexation and detoxification by the PC peptides during As poisoning.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank Helmut Hartl (Institut für Anorganische Chemie, LMU Munich) for the atomic absorption spectroscopy analyses and Burghard Cordes (Institut für Organische Chemie und Biochemie, TU Munich) for the ESI-MS analyses. Particularly, we express our gratitude to Prof. Meinhard H. Zenk and Dr. Klaus Lendzian for many helpful suggestions and continuous support.

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by the German-Israeli Foundation (to M.O.) and by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (to E.G.).

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Aposhian HV. Enzymatic methylation of arsenic species and other new approaches to arsenic toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:397–419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.37.1.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bracken WM, Klaassen CD. Induction of metallothionein in rat primary hepatocyte cultures: evidence for direct and indirect induction. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1987;22:163–174. doi: 10.1080/15287398709531060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J, Zhou J, Goldsbrough PB. Characterization of phytochelatin synthase from tomato. Physiol Plant. 1997;101:165–172. [Google Scholar]
  5. Clemens S, Kim EJ, Neumann D, Schroeder JI. Tolerance to toxic metals by a gene family of phytochelatin synthases from plants and yeast. EMBO J. 1999;18:3325–3333. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.12.3325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cullen WR, Hettipathirana DI. Application of whole cell NMR techniques to study the interaction of arsenic compounds with Catharanthus roseuscell suspension cultures. Appl Organomet Chem. 1994;8:463–471. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cullen WR, Reimer KJ. Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chem Rev. 1989;89:713–764. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dhar RK, Biswas BK, Samanta G, Mandal BK, Chakraborti D, Roy S, Jafar A, Islam A, Ara G, Kabir S, Khan AW, Ahmed SA, Hadi SA. Groundwater arsenic calamity in Bangladesh. Curr Sci. 1997;73:48–59. [Google Scholar]
  9. Edmonds JS, Francesconi KA. Arseno-sugars from brown kelp (Ecklonia radiata) as intermediates in cycling in a marine ecosystem. Nature. 1981;289:602–604. [Google Scholar]
  10. Estelle M-A, Somerville C. Auxin-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thalianawith an altered morphology. Mol Gen Genet. 1987;206:200–206. [Google Scholar]
  11. Friederich M, Kneer R, Zenk MH. Enzymic synthesis of phytochelatins in gram quantities. Phytochemistry. 1998;49:2323–2329. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gailer J, Lindner W. On-column formation of arsenic-glutathione species detected by size-exclusion chromatography in conjunction with arsenic-specific detectors. J Chromatogr B. 1998;716:83–93. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(98)00282-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gekeler W, Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Algae sequester heavy metals via synthesis of phytochelatin complexes. Arch Microbiol. 1988;150:197–202. [Google Scholar]
  14. Griffin BA, Adams SR, Tsien RY. Specific covalent labeling of recombinant protein molecules inside live cells. Science. 1998;281:269–272. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffith OW, Meister A. Potent and specific inhibition of glutathione synthesis by buthionine sulfoximine (S-n-butyl homocysteine sulfoximine) J Biol Chem. 1979;254:7558–7560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grill E. Phytochelatins in plants. In: Hamer DH, Winge DR, editors. Metal Ion Homeostasis: Molecular Biology and Biochemistry. Alan R. New York: Liss; 1989. pp. 283–300. [Google Scholar]
  17. Grill E, Löffler S, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Phytochelatins, the heavy-metal-binding peptides of plants, are synthesized from glutathione by a specific γ-glutamylcysteine dipeptidyl transpeptidase (phytochelatin synthase) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:6838–6842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.6838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grill E, Thumann J, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Induction of heavy-metal binding phytochelatins by inoculation of cell cultures in standard media. Plant Cell Rep. 1988;7:375–378. doi: 10.1007/BF00269516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Phytochelatins: the principal heavy-metal complexing peptides of higher plants. Science. 1985;230:674–676. doi: 10.1126/science.230.4726.674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Synthesis of seven different homologous phytochelatins in metal-exposed Schizosaccharomyces pombecells. FEBS Lett. 1986;197:115–120. [Google Scholar]
  21. Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Phytochelatins, a class of heavy-metal binding peptides from plants, are functionally analogous to metallothioneins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:439–443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.2.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Phytochelatins. Methods Enzymol. 1991;205:333–341. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)05115-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gussarsson M, Asp H, Adalsteinsson S, Jensén P. Enhancement of cadmium effects on growth and nutrient composition of birch (Betula pendula) by buthionine sulphoximine (BSO) J Exp Bot. 1996;47:211–215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ha S-B, Smith AP, Howden R, Dietrich WM, Bugg S, O'Connell MJ, Goldsbrough PB, Cobbett CS. Phytochelatin synthase genes from Arabidopsis and the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1153–1163. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.6.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Howden R, Cobbett CS. Cadmium-sensitive mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1992;100:100–107. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.1.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Howden R, Goldsbrough PB, Andersen CR, Cobbett CS. Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutants of Arabidopsis thalianaare phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiol. 1995;107:1059–1066. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.4.1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hwang C, Sinskey A-J, Lodish H-F. Oxidized redox state of glutathione in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 1992;257:1496–1502. doi: 10.1126/science.1523409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jocelyn PC. Biochemistry of the SH Group: The Occurrence, Chemical Properties, Metabolism and Biological Function of Thiols and Disulphides. London: Academic Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kägi JHR. Overview of metallothionein. Methods Enzymol. 1991;205:613–626. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)05145-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaiser J. Toxicologists shed new light on old poisons. Science. 1998;279:1850–1851. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5358.1850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kalef E, Gitler C. Purification of vicinal dithiol-containing proteins by arsenical-based affinity chromatography. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:395–403. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)33046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kneer R, Kutchan TM, Hochberger A, Zenk MH. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Neurospora crassacontain heavy metal sequestering phytochelatin. Arch Microbiol. 1992;157:305–310. doi: 10.1007/BF00248673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kneer R, Zenk MH. Phytochelatins protect plant enzymes from heavy metal poisoning. Phytochemistry. 1992;31:2663–2667. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kneer R, Zenk MH. The formation of Cd-phytochelatin complexes in plant cell cultures. Phytochemistry. 1997;44:69–74. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kondo N, Isobe M, Imai K, Goto T. Synthesis of metallothionein-like peptides cadystin A and B occurring in a fission yeast, and their isomers. Agric Biol Chem. 1985;49:71–83. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lakso JU, Peoples SA. Methylation of inorganic arsenic by mammals. J Agric Food Chem. 1975;23:674–676. doi: 10.1021/jf60200a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lichtenberger O, Neumann D. Analytical electron microscopy as a powerful tool in plant cell biology: examples using electron energy loss spectroscopy and x-ray microanalysis. Eur J Cell Biol. 1997;73:378–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Linsmaier EM, Skoog F. Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1965;18:100–127. [Google Scholar]
  39. Maitani T, Kubota H, Sato K, Yamada T. The composition of metals bound to class III metallothionein (phytochelatin and its desglycyl peptide) induced by various metals in root cultures of Rubia tinctorum. Plant Physiol. 1996;110:1145–1150. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.4.1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mehra RK, Kodati R, Abdullah R. Chain length-dependent Pb(II)-coordination in phytochelatins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;215:730–736. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mehra RK, Miclat J, Kodati VR, Abdullah R, Hunter TC, Mulchandani P. Optical spectroscopic and reverse-phase HPLC analyses of Hg(II) binding to phytochelatins. Biochem J. 1996a;314:73–82. doi: 10.1042/bj3140073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mehra RK, Mulchandani P. Glutathione-mediated transfer of Cu(I) into phytochelatins. Biochem J. 1995;307:697–705. doi: 10.1042/bj3070697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehra RK, Tran K, Scott GW, Mulchandani P, Saini SS. Ag (I)-binding to phytochelatins. J Inorgan Biochem. 1996b;61:125–142. doi: 10.1016/0162-0134(95)00046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–497. [Google Scholar]
  45. Mutoh N, Hayashi Y. Isolation of mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombeunable to synthesize cadystins, small cadmium-binding peptides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;151:32–39. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(88)90555-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nieboer E, Richardson DHS. The replacement of the nondescriptive term “heavy metals” by a biologically and chemically significant classification of metal ions. Environ Pollut Ser. 1980;1:3–26. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nissen P, Benson AA. Arsenic metabolism in freshwater and terrestrial plants. Physiol Plant. 1982;54:446. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nriagu JO, Pacyna JM. Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature. 1988;333:134–139. doi: 10.1038/333134a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ochiai E-I. Toxicity of heavy metals and biological defense. J Chem Educ. 1995;72:479–484. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pickering IJ, Prince RC, George GN, Rauser WE, Wickramasinghe WA, Watson AA, Dameron CT, Dance IG, Fairlie DP, Salt DE. X-ray absorption spectroscopy of cadmium phytochelatin and model systems. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1429:351–364. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(98)00242-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Reese RN, Wagner GJ. Effects of buthionine sulfoximine on Cd-binding peptide levels in suspension-cultured tobacco cells treated with Cd, Zn, or Cu. Plant Physiol. 1987;84:574–577. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.3.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Salt DE, Prince RC, Pickering IJ, Raskin I. Mechanisms of cadmium mobility and accumulation in Indian mustard. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:1427–1433. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.4.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Scott N, Hatlelid KM, MacKenzie NE, Carter DE. Reactions of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) species with glutathione. Chem Res Toxicol. 1993;6:102–106. doi: 10.1021/tx00031a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Silver S. Bacterial resistance to toxic metal ions: a review. Gene. 1996;179:9–19. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00323-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Strasdeit H, Duhme A-K, Kneer R, Zenk MH, Hermes C, Nolting H-F. Evidence for discrete Cd(SCys)4units in cadmium phytochelatin complexes from EXAFS spectroscopy. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1991;1991:1129–1130. [Google Scholar]
  56. Thumann J, Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Reactivation of metal-requiring apoenzymes by phytochelatin-metal complexes. FEBS Lett. 1991;284:66–69. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80763-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Steveninck RFM, Van Steveninck ME, Fernando DR, Edwards LB, Wells AJ. Electron probe x-ray microanalytical evidence for two distinct mechanisms of Zn and Cd binding in a Zn tolerant clone of Lemna minorL. CR Acad Sci Ser III Sci Vie. 1990;310:671–678. [Google Scholar]
  58. Vatamaniuk OK, Mari S, Lu Y-P, Rea PA. AtPCS1, a phytochelatin synthase from Arabidopsis: isolation and in vitroreconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:7110–7115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.7110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vögeli-Lange R, Wagner GJ. Subcellular localization of cadmium and cadmium-binding peptides in tobacco leaves: implication of a transport function for cadmium-binding peptides. Plant Physiol. 1990;92:1086–1093. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.4.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Warren HV, Delavault RE, Barakso J. The role of arsenic as a pathfinder in biogeochemical prospecting. Econ Geol. 1964;59:1381–1385. [Google Scholar]
  61. Webb EC, van Heyningen R. The action of British anti-lewisite (BAL) on enzyme systems. Biochem J. 1947;41:74–78. doi: 10.1042/bj0410074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Webb JL. Arsenicals. In: Webb JL, editor. Enzyme and Metabolic Inhibitors. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press; 1966. pp. 595–819. [Google Scholar]
  63. Whittaker VP. An experimental investigation of the “ring hypothesis” of arsenical toxicity. Biochem J. 1947;41:56–62. doi: 10.1042/bj0410056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zenk MH. Heavy metal detoxification in higher plants: a review. Gene. 1996;179:21–30. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00422-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES