Table 2.
Regression results for mediation.
| Variable | b | SE | t | P | LLCI | ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct and total effects | ||||||
| JA regressed on D (a) | -0.19 | 0.07 | -2.62 | 0.009 | -0.34 | -0.05 |
| PWB regressed on JA, controlling D (b) | -1.58 | 0.49 | -3.22 | 0.001 | -2.55 | -0.61 |
| PWB regressed on D, controlling JA (c) | 1.97 | 0.40 | 4.93 | 0.000 | 1.18 | 2.77 |
| PWB regressed on D (c′) | 1.66 | 0.40 | 4.21 | 0.001 | 0.88 | 2.45 |
| Value | SE | z | P | |||
| Indirect effect and significance using normal distribution | ||||||
| Sobel | 0.31 | 0.15 | 1.98 | 0.047 | ||
| M | SE | LLCI | ULCI | |||
| Bootstrap results for indirect effect | ||||||
| Effect | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.89 | ||
N = 114. D, discriminatory work environment; JA, job autonomy; PWB, psychological well-being; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 10,000.