Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 26;5(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/rehab.8548

Table 3.

Summary of reports on the assessment of performance deficits when using objects in stroke patients. LBD: left brain damage.

Reference Objects used Result Type of scoring
Liepmann [8] Comb, brush, hammer Errors in 25% of “dyspraxics” (N=42) Right or wrong
De Renzi and Luchelli [36] Common-use objects All of them made errors Major or minor or no error
McDonald et al [37] Cup, key, fan, scissors 17 LBD patients: no differentiation from other task modes Right or wrong
Buxbaum et al [38] Common-use objects Single case: fewer errors during use Grasp, trajectory, amplitude, and timing
Westwood et al [39] Hammer, saw, spectacles Object use deficit: 37 LBD patients (43%); 50 right brain damage patients (18%) Performance accuracy from composite scores
Goldenberg et al [40] Glass, apple, electric bulb, squeezer 10 LBD patients: more errors in the use of actual tools The presence of feature for grasping and movement
Randerath et al [41] Hammer, ladle 25 LBD patients: errors in almost all conditions The presence of features: grasp, movement execution, direction, space