. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004675. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004675

Table 1.

Site characteristics by video consent capability

	All PALM Sites			PALM Sites With At Least 1 Enrolled Patient
	Video consent approved (n = 67)	Video consent not approved (n = 86)	P-value	Video consent approved (n = 60)	Video consent not approved (n = 80)	P-value
Number of providers at site	5 (3, 12)	10 (4, 22)	0.09	5 (3, 11)	10 (4, 22)	0.12
Central IRB	60 (89.6%)	63 (73.3%)	0.01	55 (91.7%)	58 (72.5%)	0.005
Rural location^*	10 (14.9%)	3 (3.5%)	0.01	10 (16.7%)	3 (3.8%)	0.01
Training facility^†	9 (13.4%)	14 (16.3%)	0.61	7 (11.7%)	14 (17.5%)	0.35
Cardiology practice	38 (56.7%)	47 (54.7%)	0.80	35 (58.3%)	42 (52.5%)	0.49

Rural location based on site zip code metropolitan statistical area;

^†

At least one provider sees patients with trainees (residents, fellows, etc). Continuous variables represented as median (25^th, 75^th percentiles); categorical variables represented as frequency (percent).