Table 2.
Logistic models comparing the participants in each latent class by their characteristics
| Multinomial logistic model | OR of being in class 2 vs. class 1 | OR of being in class 3 vs. class 1 | Overall | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Intervals | p value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Intervals | p value | p value | ||
| Age | 1.13 | 0.98 | 1.31 | 0.09 | 1.16 | 0.975 | 1.37 | 0.095 | 0.17 |
| Sex (Female vs. male) | 0.28 | 0.04 | 1.83 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.016 | 1.22 | 0.075 | 0.19 |
| Timed get up and go (TUG) | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.86 | 0.013 | 0.88 | 0.50 | 1.53 | 0.64 | 0.03 |
| CHAMPSTOTAL | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
| Frequency per week, all PA | 2.77 | 1.39 | 5.51 | 0.004 | 2.57 | 1.18 | 5.60 | 0.018 | 0.01 |
| CHAMPSMOD_EXERCISE | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.54 |
| Frequency per week, at least moderate intensity PA | 1.17 | 0.38 | 3.55 | 0.79 | 1.99 | 0.58 | 6.81 | 0.27 | 0.50 |
CHAMPS Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors