Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 10;13(4):e0194905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194905

Table 1. Overview of the 39 experimental sites.

Mean ± SE given for each of the environmental variables. We conducted pairwise comparisons for the tests showing a significant effect of management strategy. Deadwood volume of spruce (m3/ha) was divided into classes based on decay stage and substrate type.

Stand type Old growth Reference Selective-felling Thinning Clear-cutting F-value DF p pairwise
Original state Uneven Uneven Uneven Even Uneven
Current state Uneven Uneven Uneven Even Even
Number of stands 8 8 9 5 9
Size (ha) 19.5 ± 9.0 7.2 ±1.6 8.0 ± 0.7 7.7 ± 3.0 5.7 ± 1.3 1.7 4 0.2
Altitude (masl) 418 ± 23 365 ± 25 391 ± 9 366 ± 34 376 ± 18 1.2 4 0.3
Years since harvest NA NA 7.4 ± 1.7 6.2 ± 2.2 6.7 ± 1.8 0.3 2 0.8
Basal area (m2) 25.7 ± 2.9 24.5 ± 1.0 17.9 ± 1.0 18.5 ±2.3 0.3 ± 0.1 43.2 4 <0.01 OG,R> SF,T> CC
Spruce % of BA 80.8 ± 6.0 80.3 ± 3.7 80.0 ± 4.1 83.2 ± 7.1 NA 0.0 3 0.9
Birch % of BA 5.0 ± 2.3 14.2 ± 3.4 13.4 ± 2.1 8.0 ± 3.0 NA 2.4 3 0.09
Deadwood (m3) 46.2 ± 11.4 16.9 ± 4.2 13.0 ± 3.5 4.6 ± 1.0 8.5 ± 3.2 15.2 4 0.03 OG> R,SF> T,CC
Early decay logs 10.8 ± 2.8 3.7 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 1.0 2.9 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.9 5.8 4 <0.01 OG> R,SF,T,CC
Late decay logs 17.4 ± 4.7 3.3 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 2.0 0.7 ± 0.3 4.9 ± 1.6 5.7 4 <0.01 OG>R,SF,T,CC
Early decay standing 11.8 ± 2.1 5.1 ± 1.6 2.6 ± 1.0 1.1 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.5 10.9 4 <0.01 OG>R,SF,T,CC;
R>T,CC
Late decay standing 6.2 ± 1.8 4.7 ± 1.3 1.6 ± 0.6 0 0.6 ± 0.3 5.7 4 <0.01 OG,R >SF, T,CC

OG = old growth, R = reference, SF = selective-felling, T = thinning, CC = clearcut.