Table 2. ManyGLM analyses.

Differences in beetle assemblage between stands with different management strategies for data from bolts, window traps and early (decay class preference below 3; dead wood still hard) and late successional species (decay class preference 3 and above; wood has started to soften), respectively. Overall results from manyGLM are presented at the top of the table, followed by the effect of management strategy from the pairwise comparisons.

	Bolts			Window trap comparison			Early species			Late species
	Deviance	p	DF	Deviance	p	DF	Deviance	p	DF	Deviance	p	DF
Management strategy	178	<0.01	34	310	<0.01	33	575	<0.01	33	951	<0.01	33
Stand size	25	0.75	33	67	<0.01	32	127	0.01	32	133	0.2	32
Altitude	44	0.09	32	53	0.03	31	134	0.01	31	210	<0.01	31
Pairwise comparisons	Deviance	p	DF	Deviance	p	DF	Deviance	p	DF	Deviance	p	DF
CC vs T	65.6	<0.01	11	136.9	<0.01	10	213.4	0.02	10	357.8	<0.01	10
CC vs SF	54.6	<0.01	15	147.3	<0.01	14	208.2	<0.01	14	387.4	<0.01	14
CC vs R	55.9	<0.01	13	142.5	<0.01	12	213.8	<0.01	12	340.1	<0.01	12
CC vs OG	70.5	<0.01	14	118.8	<0.01	13	220.8	<0.01	13	389.3	<0.01	13
T vs SF	41.0	0.14	10	66.0	0.09	10	98.2	0.30	10	193.7	0.10	10
T vs R	34.3	0.05	9	56.5	0.03	9	82.3	0.05	9	130.0	0.05	9
T vs OG	35.4	0.29	9	69.9	0.14	9	114.6	0.20	9	183.5	0.10	9
SF vs R	19.4	0.41	12	32.8	0.19	12	70.2	0.13	12	109.7	0.11	12
SF vs OG	29.4	0.13	13	12.0	0.9	13	61.7	0.32	13	117.0	0.12	13
R vs OG	31.2	0.10	11	33.2	0.17	11	89.0	0.04	11	85.1	0.22	11

SF = selective felling. CC = clearcut T = thinning. R = reference, OG = Old growth. Bold numbers highlight significant p-values. Italics highlight marginally significant p-values.