Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 29;12(3):e0006361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006361

Table 2. IgM and IgG ELISA results in patients grom various settings.

Clinical condition and setting Type of IgG ELISA No. samples / patients tested ELISA result (% samples)
IgM+a IgM+ onlyb IgM+ and IgG+c IgG+d IgG+ onlye
Clinical Lassa fever suspicion and Lassa virus RT-PCR-positive on diagnostic specimen in endemic area (Nigeria) RF 270/270 31.1 5.2 25.9 33.7 7.8
CD32 270/270 31.1 5.2 25.9 33.3 7.4
Follow-up specimens of Lassa virus RT-PCR-positive patients (Nigeria) RF 179/47 62.0 1.7 60.3 71.5 11.2
CD32 179/47 62.0 3.4 58.7 69.8 11.2
Clinical Lassa fever suspicion and Lassa virus RT-PCR-negative in endemic area (Nigeria) RF 101/101 5.0f 1.0 4.0f 20.8 16.8
CD32 101/101 5.0f 1.0 4.0f 23.8 19.8
Clinical VHF suspicion and Lassa virus RT-PCR-negative in non-endemic area (Ghana) RF 199/199 6.5g 6.5 0 0 0
CD32 100/100 7.0g 7.0 0 0 0
Patients with various diseases in non-endemic area (Germany) RF 105/105 0 0 0 0 0
CD32 100/100 0 0 0 0 0

Abbreviations: ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; RF, rheumatoid factor; VHF, viral hemorrhagic fever.

a Sample was IgM positive irrespective of IgG result.

b Sample was IgM positive and IgG negative.

c Sample was IgM positive and IgG positive.

d Sample was IgG positive irrespective of IgM result.

e Sample was IgG positive and IgM negative.

f All IgM and IgG positive samples also tested positive for IgM and IgG, respectively, in IFA.

g All IgM positive samples tested negative for IgM in IFA.