Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell Neurosci. 2017 Dec 5;88:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2017.12.002

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Learning deficits of munc18+/− mice in Intellicage reversal task assay. (A) Picture of the Intellicage setup and illustration of the place learning and reversal paradigm. (B) Error rates of six-month-old munc18-1+/− (n=7) and WT (n=7) animals during the place learning task in the Intellicage (calculated as [100*(number of incorrect visits/total number of visits)]. (C) Bar graph depicts the munc18-1+/− animals’ performance during the reversal task in the Intellicage with an error rate (82.9 ± 8.1%, n=7) significantly worse than WT (56 ± 11.8%, n=7), (p<0.05, 1-tailed t-test). Results are shown as Mean ± S.E.M.