Table 2.
Comparison of mean accuracy of different protocols between O1 and O2 over FST
| FST | O1 | O2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K2 | K4 | K5 | K10 | JK | K2 | K4 | K5 | K10 | JK | |
| F1 | 81.58 | 81.97 | 84.23 | 84.66 | 86.05 | 84.30 | 85.71 | 85.88 | 85.86 | 88.45 |
| F2 | 81.84 | 81.45 | 83.23 | 83.56 | 86.77 | 84.66 | 86.16 | 84.40 | 84.40 | 88.40 |
| F3 | 81.92 | 82.73 | 81.88 | 81.90 | 86.19 | 84.50 | 85.27 | 85.64 | 84.73 | 88.45 |
| F4 | 81.48 | 81.98 | 83.09 | 82.23 | 85.66 | 83.71 | 84.60 | 83.73 | 84.60 | 87.91 |
| F5 | 81.94 | 81.94 | 82.51 | 82.47 | 87.89 | 83.77 | 83.44 | 84.20 | 84.01 | 87.75 |
| F6 | 71.48 | 73.51 | 74.90 | 74.82 | 78.13 | 75.53 | 75.82 | 76.77 | 77.35 | 79.32 |
Bold values indicate the highest classification accuracy