Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 10;42(5):92. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0940-7

Table 5.

Comparison of accuracy of classifier’s between O1 and O2 over protocols and FST

CT* O1 O2
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6
C1 78.14 78.15 77.51 77.74 78.22 71.23 84.03 83.73 83.68 82.82 83.04 76.98
C2 75.45 77.21 74.58 75.49 76.75 69.63 83.99 83.73 83.82 83.29 83.33 76.48
C3 77.56 78.13 76.90 77.75 78.7 70.54 83.77 83.67 83.73 82.63 82.89 77.10
C4 87.67 86.82 85.50 85.00 85.92 76.48 88.40 87.46 87.70 86.44 87.05 78.60
C5 87.44 85.94 85.23 84.44 85.85 74.07 86.72 85.97 86.37 84.80 85.11 76.48
C6 81.15 78.75 82.08 81.01 80.62 71.00 79.87 78.47 79.39 80.38 78.01 73.04
C7 89.92 89.00 89.24 88.34 88.39 74.52 88.38 89.07 89.06 86.95 86.20 72.47
C8 80.13 80.01 79.28 81.21 80.35 73.80 85.71 85.77 85.59 85.00 84.74 79.24
C9 88.16 88.44 87.42 86.98 87.88 77.33 87.24 87.11 86.85 86.62 86.14 75.90
C10 91.35 91.25 91.50 90.92 90.84 78.15 92.29 91.05 90.98 90.16 89.81 77.39

Bold values indicate the highest classification accuracy

* Classifier types