Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;9:658. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00658

Table 2.

Distribution and corresponding carbapenem MIC ranges for strains with different resistance determinants.

Carbapenem resistance mechanisms No. of isolates MIC range (mg/L)
ETP IMP MEM
Carbapenemase positive
    NDM-1, loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 19 16–256 4–64 4–128
    NDM-1+IMP-8, loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 1 128 128 32
    IMP-8, loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 4 8–64 0.25–8 2–8
    IMP-4, no loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 2 16 0.5–2 0.5–1
    KPC-2, loss or decreased OMPs 1 64 8 16
Carbapenemase negative
    AmpC, ESBLs, loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 42 2–64 0.5–32 0.5–32
    AmpC, ESBLs, loss or decreased OMPs 29 2–64 0.25–16 0.25–32
    AmpC, loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 22 2–64 0.25–16 0.25–8
    ESBLs, loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 11 2–32 0.25–2 0.25–8
    ESBLs, loss or decreased OMPs 2 8 0.25–2 0.25–4
    Loss or decreased OMPs, efflux pump 5 2–8 0.25–2 0.25–2

ETP, ertapenem; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem.