Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;9:423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00423

Table 2.

Descriptive behavioral results. The table shows the selection response rate (%), according to whether participants perceived a good or bad mood of senders, and Reaction times (RT), for each condition (NN: Negative Congruent; PP: Positive Congruent; NP: Positive Incongruent; PN: Negative Incongruent). For all results, Standard Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SEM) are indicated.

GOOD MOOD
BAD MOOD
Frequency RT Frequency RT
NN MEAN 1,099 (3,662%) 1,138 28,901 (96,338%) 1,028
SD 1,485 0,621 1,485 0,404
SEM 0,176 0,074 0,176 0,048
PP MEAN 28,000 (93,333%) 1,065 2,000 (6,667%) 1,502
SD 1,986 0,429 1,986 0,902
SEM 0,236 0,051 0,236 0,107
NP MEAN 6,704 (22,347%) 1,636 23,296 (77,653%) 1,467
SD 6,477 0,886 6,477 0,651
SEM 0,769 0,105 0,769 0,077
PN MEAN 12,789 (42,629%) 1,872 17,211 (57,371%) 1,878
SD 7,688 1,280 7,688 1,102
SEM 0,912 0,152 0,912 0,131