Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 10;16:76. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1378-6

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Meta-analysis of GEO microarrays. a Forest plot of miR-182-5p expression data from GEO microarrays. The pooled SMD of miR-182-5p was 1.54 (95% CI 0.74 to 2.34) by the random effects model. The I-squared value was 77.4%, and the p value was less than 0.001. b Sensitivity analysis of GEO microarrays. c A funnel plot was used to show the publication bias of GEO microarrays (Begg’s method). d Summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve (AUC) of miR-182-5p in the diagnosis of LUSC data from the GEO microarrays. The AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98)