Table 2.
Phase | Robustness (discriminatory capacity) |
Size (patient no) |
Description | Duration (months) |
Ib/2a | Very high | 60–100 |
Based on BOLD design.
77
Withdraw or quickly taper all background medications in an active, mild–moderate population without risk for organ-threatening disease |
6–8 |
High | 100–200 | Based on Anifrolumab Ph 2 design. 12 Require steroid taper as tolerated in patients with moderate to moderately severe disease. | 6–12 | |
Increases efficiency of any design | 60–200 | Adaptive Trial: Example of PERFECT design. 80 Exploratory pharmacodynamics optimise dosing or determine continuation to efficacy endpoint | 12 | |
2b/3 | High | 150–300 | Based on Anifrolumab Ph 2 design. 12 Require steroid taper as tolerated in patients with moderate to moderately severe disease | 6–12 |
High | 150–300 | Based on Classic Design but restricted to patients with more severe disease. 76 No medication taper required. An optimal design would select background treatments based on rational pharmacodynamics. | 6–12 | |
Increases efficiency of any design | 150–300 | Adaptive Trial 79: Here Pharmacodynamic exploration is not part of trial, but dosing adjustments and/or primary endpoint may be adjusted based on clinical or biomarker-driven data (patients who fail screening can be retained for secondary endpoints or safety). | 12 |