Table 2.

Path Coefficients with Standard Errors and Bootstrap Point Estimates with Confidence Intervals for Moderated Mediation Models (Study 2)

Mediator (Med)	Effect of EC on Med. (a1)	Effect of NI on Med. (a2)	Effect of EC × NI interactionon Med. (a3)	Effect of Med. on Depressive Symptoms (b)	Direct Effect of EC on Depressive Symptoms (c’)	Conditional Indirect Effect of EC on Depressive Symptoms via Med. (ab) at Percentile Levels of NI
						Very Low (10%)	Low (25%)	Moderate (50%)	High (75%)	Very High (90%)
Reappraisal	.39 (11)***	−.31 (.09)***	.04 (.02)*	−.39 (.11)***	−.54 (.19)**	−.05 [−.25, .09]	−.09 [−.27, .01]	−.15 [−.31, −.06]	−.21 [−.40, −.10]	−.26 [−.48 −.11]
Non-acceptance	−.35 (.09)***	.30 (.08)***	.04 (.02)**	.46 (.11)***	−.50 (.17)**	−.30 [−.53, −.12]	−.24 [−.43, −.10]	−.16 [−.30, −.06]	−.08 [−.21, .02]	−.02 [−.16, .12]
Experiential Avoidance	−.70 (.13)***	.75 (.10)***	.06 (.02)**	.82 (.10)***	−.29 (.22)	−.95 [− 1.46, −.58]	−.79 [− 1.21, −.48]	−.58 [−.89, −.33]	−.36 [−.62, −.15]	−.21 [−.47, .04]
Rumination	−.17 (.04)***	.27 (.03)***	.01 (.01)	1.27 (.23)***	−.40 (.17)*	−.28 [−.54, −.12]	−.25 [−.46, −.13]	−.22 [−.37, −.11]	−.18 [−.33, −.06]	−.15 [−.32, −.00]

Note. EC = Emotional Clarity (Gratz & Roemer, 2004 [reverse-scored, so that higher numbers correspond to higher self-reported clarity]). NI = Negative Intensity subscale, Affect Intensity Measure (Bryant et al., 1996). Raw values for 10^th, 25^th, 50^th, 75^th, and 90^th percentiles of negative affect intensity are 16, 19, 23, 27, and 30, respectively. Standard errors for path coefficients appear in parentheses. 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals for point estimates appear in brackets; point estimates are interpreted as significant if confidence intervals do not contain zero; significant point estimates are boldfaced.

^*p<.05.

^**p<.01.

^***p<.001.