Table 2.
Average performance of locus sets in assembly for 44 Buddleja samples (excludes two Buddleja samples with failed sequencing) and four outgroup samples.a
| Locus sets | Buddleja | Outgroup | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of sequences | Total length | No. of sequences | Total length | |
| Taxon‐specific | 1845 (98%)A | 567,161 (98%)Y | 992 (53%) | 287,344 (50%) |
| General | 984 (95%) | 421,307 (98%) | 733 (71%) | 312,062 (72%) |
| COSII | 264 (94%)C | 72,207 (96%)Z | 184 (66%) | 48,390 (65%) |
| APVO SSC | 549 (96%)B | 170,224 (97%)Y | 425 (74%) | 130,148 (74%) |
| PPR | 171 (98%)A | 178,876 (100%)X | 124 (71%) | 133,524 (74%) |
| Total | 2829 (97%) | 988,468 (98%) | 1724 (59%) | 599,405 (59%) |
a
Shown are the average number of target sequences with assembled coding sequence and the average total length of assembled coding sequences. In parentheses are the percentages of total target sequences used for probe design. Superscript letters show significant differences in averages at the 0.05 level among locus sets for Buddleja samples from Tukey multiple comparison tests with blocking by sample.