. 2018 Apr 5;9:334. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00334

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of morphometric and hemodynamic parameters in control and HH groups.

Groups		Control group	HH group	p-value
MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS
D_CHA (mm)	Mean ± SD	2.9 ± 0.4	4.7 ± 1.4	<0.05
	95% CI	2.6–3.2	3.8–5.5
D_CeTA (mm)	Mean ± SD	5.8 ± 0.9	6.6 ± 1.1	0.099
	95% CI	5.1–6.5	5.9–7.3
D_TA (mm)	Mean ± SD	19.7 ± 1.9	21.5 ± 2.5	0.094
	95% CI	18.3–21.1	19.9–23.0
L_{A₀A_m} (mm)	Mean ± SD	38 ± 12.7	42.7 ± 13.6	0.432
	95% CI	28.2–47.8	34.1–51.3
L_{A₀⋯A_m} (mm)	Mean ± SD	46.9 ± 19	62.0 ± 19.0	0.088
	95% CI	32.3–61.5	49.9–74.0
$\frac{D_{C H A}}{D_{C e T A}}$	Mean ± SD	0.51 ± 0.11	0.71 ± 0.19	<0.05
	95% CI	0.43–0.6	0.59–0.83
$\frac{D_{C H A}}{D_{T A}}$	Mean ± SD	0.15 ± 0.02	0.22 ± 0.08	<0.05
	95% CI	0.13–0.17	0.17–0.27
$\frac{D_{C e T A}}{D_{T A}}$	Mean ± SD	0.3 ± 0.05	0.31 ± 0.06	0.566
	95% CI	0.26–0.33	0.27–0.35
$\frac{L_{A_{0} A_{m}}}{L_{A_{0} {\dots A}_{m}}}$	Mean ± SD	0.84 ± 0.11	0.69 ± 0.11	<0.05
	95% CI	0.75–0.92	0.63–0.76
HEMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
D_Inlet (mm)		21.5 ± 2.1	22.3 ± 3.4	0.704
Re_mean		1028 ± 101	1065 ± 163	0.704
AREA RATIOS AT BIFURCATIONS BETWEEN CeTA AND CHA AND SA
SAR-TAWSS (%)		4 ± 5	14.3 ± 4.4	<0.05
SAR-TAWSSG (%)		27 ± 38	36.1 ± 28.5	0.678
AREA RATIOS IN CHAs
SAR-TAWSS (%)		<0.1	6.3 ± 5.1	<0.05
SAR-TAWSSG (%)		68 ± 33	55.4 ± 17.1	0.445
AREA RATIOS IN ABDOMINAL AORTAS
SAR-TAWSS (%)		17 ± 22	43.6 ± 8.4	<0.05
SAR-TAWSSG (%)		1 ± 1	2.1 ± 1.3	0.17