Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 May 30;178:310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.039

Table 3.

Alcohol Users: The effect of left FP cTBS treatment (LTD-like) on the BOLD response to mPFC stimulation, factorial design.

Contrast Cluster Local Maxima MNI coordinates Description
p-value& size Z x y z Label^
Brain Regions with lower BOLD signal to following Real (versus Sham) cTBS #
<0.001 1139 3.29 −60 −10 29 Postcentral Insula (Posterior)
3.28 −36 32 2 Frontal Orbital, Insula (Anterior)
3.05 −51 2 38 Precentral, Inferior Frontal
Brain Regions with higher BOLD signal to following Real (versus Sham) cTBS%
 No significant clusters

These data reflect the results of the positive (#) and negative (%) interaction terms of the factorial design {Real versus Sham for the “Before cTBS” greater than “After cTBS” contrast}.

&

Clusters displayed that meet Family Wise Error multiple comparison correction p<0.05.

^

Labels reflect consensus results from 6mm sphere around local maxima, Harvard-Oxford Atlas and Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas